HUMZA Yousaf’s decision to suddenly boot the Scottish Greens from government may have seemed incomprehensible to some observers of and actors in the nation’s political scene.
The Greens themselves were stunned to be ejected from government and many have questioned the rapidity with which Yousaf turned on his former partners.
But the decision seems to have been brewing for some time and sources close to the First Minister stress he came to the decision himself.
Kevin Pringle, a special adviser to the First Minister, has been arguing against Bute House Agreement, as it was, since at least this time last year.
A former key player in Alex Salmond’s (below) government, Pringle is respected and viewed as a serious operator in Scottish politics.
In a New Statesman profile of Pringle following his re-entry to government last year the special adviser is described as being “more pragmatic and hard-headed than most of those working in the government”.
He is praised for his past record in government and for his nearly 10 years’ experience in the private sector.
The author of the piece, Chris Deerin, also interviewed Yousaf for the story, with the First Minister quoted as saying he would keep the SNP’s deal with the Greens “under regular review”.
Yousaf added: “If I ever thought it wasn’t in the party’s best interests then we’d take that decision to end the co-operation agreement.”
READ MORE: Ash Regan says 'door is open' in letter to Humza Yousaf ahead of confidence vote
It was published in October last year and ends with the words: “So far, I’ve been pretty impressed by some of the rhetoric coming from Yousaf [below].
"I’d like to believe he will live up to it, but action is always harder than words. Pringle will just have to keep pushing.”
Pringle has been publicly pushing against the Greens deal since April. In a piece for The Courier he said his party were “overvaluing” the Bute House Agreement and said SNP MSPs viewed it as “sacrosanct”.
He added: “Looked at from a longer perspective, minority government has worked well for the SNP – and for Scotland.
“During the two parliaments when the SNP formed minority administrations – 2007-11 and 2016-21 – the party advanced at the subsequent election.
READ MORE: Inside the room as Humza Yousaf sacked the Scottish Greens from government
“Indeed, when Mr Salmond led an extremely minority government (with only 47 MSPs out of 129) the SNP did so well that it went on to win an overall majority within a proportional representation voting system.”
He went on to say that “on balance” he remained supportive of the deal but added he did not think “it should be regarded as an absolute”, adding: “The Bute House Agreement wasn’t carved on tablets of stone.”
Pringle explains that he believes that the experience of being in government “would change the Greens […] for the better”.
He added: “Politicians who have served in government will form a better opposition, which in turn should make for a better government.
“Today it’s the SNP and Greens in power. It will change again in future.”
The future has come sooner than Pringle may have predicted.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel