PEOPLE suffering from depression or anxiety in England could lose access to sickness benefits as part of the Tory government’s major welfare reforms, the Work and Pensions Secretary has said.
Mel Stride is set to announce plans to overhaul the way disability benefits work in a statement to the Commons on Monday, with proposals aimed at providing “more tailored support in line with their needs”.
In a Green Paper due to be published alongside Stride’s statement, ministers will set out plans to reform personal independence payments (PIP), the main disability benefit, through changes to eligibility criteria and assessments.
The system is different in Scotland however, where people apply for the Adult Disability Payment instead of PIP.
READ MORE: Who are the favourites to replace Humza Yousaf as SNP leader?
The plans, which will be consulted on over the coming months, also include proposals to “move away from a fixed cash benefit system,” meaning people with some conditions will no longer receive regular payments but rather improved access to treatment if their condition does not involve extra costs.
In an interview with The Times, Stride (below) suggested this would mean people with “milder mental health conditions” would no longer receive financial support.
Monday’s proposals follow a speech in which the Prime Minister announced major changes to the welfare system earlier this month, saying “people with less severe mental health conditions should be expected to engage with the world of work”.
Stride said the system should not be paying people to deal with the “ordinary difficulties of life” and suggested that many voters “deep down” agree with him.
Describing the reforms as “probably the most fundamental reforms in a generation,” he said: “There are those that have perhaps milder mental health conditions, or where perhaps there has been too great a move towards labelling certain behaviours as having certain (medical) conditions attached to them, where actually work is the answer or part of the answer.
“What we’ve got to avoid is being in a situation where we too readily say ‘Well, actually, we need you to be on benefits’.”
READ MORE: What happens if Humza Yousaf resigns as First Minister?
Stride said a “whole plethora of things,” such as talking therapies, social care packages and respite care, could be used as alternatives to benefit payments.
He added that the main reason for the changes is to provide better help and not cut costs, but he acknowledged the cost “has to be one of the considerations”.
James Taylor, the executive director of strategy at disability equity charity Scope, called for an end to the “reckless assault” on disabled people and to fix the “real underlying issues”.
“It’s hard to have any faith that this consultation is about anything other than cutting the benefits bill, no matter the impact,” Taylor said.
“Life costs a lot more for disabled people, including people with mental health conditions. Threatening to take away the low amount of income PIP provides won’t solve the country’s problems.
“The Government needs to end this reckless assault on disabled people and focus on how to fix the real underlying issues.”
Subscribe to The National for just £20 for an entire year
The number of monthly PIP awards for mental health disorders has doubled since 2019, from 2200 to 5300, in line with an increase in overall PIP awards which have also doubled to 33,000 a month.
Rishi Sunak said Monday’s Green Paper marks “the next chapter of our welfare reforms” that will make the benefits system “fairer to the taxpayer, better targeted to individual needs and harder to exploit”.
He said: “It’s clear that our disability benefits system isn’t working in the way it was intended, and we’re determined to reform it to ensure it’s sustainable for the future, so we can continue delivering support to those who genuinely need it most.”
The three key changes set to be included in the Green Paper are:
- Changing PIP eligibility criteria to better reflect how conditions affect a claimant’s daily life;
- Making the PIP assessment more closely linked to someone’s condition, including removing assessments entirely for some conditions supported by medical evidence;
- Moving away from a fixed cash benefit for some conditions, providing either one-off grants for specific costs such as home adaptation, or ensuring access to “alternative means of support”.
The Government hopes the overall impact will be to move to a system where PIP is more geared towards covering the actual extra costs faced by people with disabilities.
Acting shadow work and pensions secretary Alison McGovern said: “The Government’s failure to get Britain working is terrible for people and catastrophic for the public finances.
“The PIP system that the Tories created isn’t working for disabled people and isn’t working for the taxpayer. We want to see a system that allows disabled people to live independently and enable as many as possible to work.
“Merely consulting on this now, after overseeing years of failure and a soaring benefits bill, proves this Conservative Government is out of ideas and out of time.
“Our plan to get Britain working will drive down NHS waiting lists, reform social security and make work pay. Change with Labour can’t come soon enough.”
The consultation will run for 12 weeks, closing on July 23.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel