FOUR senior female BBC journalists who have launched legal action against the broadcaster claiming a job application process was “rigged” will not be able to bring a claim for equal pay, an employment tribunal has ruled.
Martine Croxall, Karin Giannone, Kasia Madera and Annita McVeigh launched an employment tribunal against the BBC, alleging they were snubbed over chief presenter roles following the merger of the BBC’s News and World News channels.
The journalists, who are all aged 49 to 55, had included a claim for equal pay as part of their legal challenge to the BBC, but this was dismissed at a preliminary hearing at the Central London Employment Tribunal.
Subscribe to The National for just £20 for an entire year
On Thursday, employment tribunal judge Sarah Goodman concluded that the women, who had previously reached settlements with the BBC, could not bring new equal pay claims.
Lawyers for the BBC had described the situation as being like “seeking a second bite of the cherry on the same set of facts”.
The women believe they have not been paid equally compared with their male counterparts since February 2020.
All the journalists are expected to give evidence during their full employment tribunal against the BBC, which was set for three weeks from March 17 next year.
Croxall and McVeigh, who are both 55, plus Madera, 49, allege discrimination on the grounds of age, sex, being a union member and wages.
Giannone, 50, alleges discrimination based on age, sex and wages.
They were also given the go-ahead to have their cases heard jointly.
The BBC is resisting the women’s legal claim in which they allege they lost their jobs and were kept off air for a year when they challenged the process.
The women alleged they have been left to suffer victimisation, harassment and reputational damage.
READ MORE: Joanna Cherry: I wanted a contest but I'll back John Swinney – here's why
After the preliminary hearing, which laid out the groundwork for a full tribunal, a BBC spokesman said: “We are pleased with the result and that the tribunal has accepted our position. We will not be commenting further at this stage.”
It is believed that the BBC’s position is that it has complied with equal pay legislation.
It is also understood that the BBC is confident it applied a rigorous and fair recruitment process and that all managers conducted that process properly.
In their similar witness statements, the women say: “Four of us have been demoted, three are facing a sizeable pay cut, with a fourth having had her pay cut for half of her job.
“No men and no women younger than us suffered these detriments.”
The women applied for the new roles as BBC News chief presenters, but lost out to successful applicants including Matthew Amroliwala.
READ MORE: John Swinney set to become Scotland's seventh first minister
In their tribunal claim, the women said that a manager had told union reps in consultation meetings that new lower-paid correspondent-presenter jobs were intended as development opportunities, meaning they were for people with less experience than them.
They also said that the cuts have left the new channel understaffed and that director-general Tim Davie had said publicly on several occasions he wanted far fewer presenters.
The women believe that they have not been paid equally compared with their male counterparts since February 2020, and that there was a gap of about £36,000 a year in pensionable salary as of February 2023.
They described themselves as having been “set up to fail in the jobs process” which saw them being denied work while less experienced freelancers and casuals have covered shifts they could have done.
Annita McVeigh, Martine Croxall, Karin Giannone and Kasia Madera
Being kept off the air happened against their will and took place amid press and social media speculation about their futures to which they had right of reply, they added.
The stress of the “bogus” process, a year of uncertainty and publicity about their careers has caused distress and has affected their health, they said. The BBC has denied the claims.
Croxall, who has worked for the BBC since October 1991, has been a chief presenter with the BBC News Channel and BBC World News since 2001. She has also appeared on BBC One network news bulletins.
Since March 2012, Madera has been a chief presenter with the BBC News Channel and BBC World News, and also appeared on BBC1 network news bulletins.
READ MORE: Neil Gray rips into Ash Regan after Alba vote to take down Government
She described her work as “a huge part of who I am and I am very proud to work for BBC News”.
McVeigh, who has worked for the BBC since October 1995, has been a chief presenter with the BBC News Channel and BBC World News since 2006. She has also appeared on BBC network news.
Giannone starting working for the BBC in January 2005. She became a permanent staff member in April 2008 and has been a chief presenter on BBC World News and the BBC News Channel.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel