STEPHEN Flynn is being lined up as a “long-term option” for SNP leader with John Swinney simply being a “stop-gap” until the next Scottish election, party insiders have claimed.
Senior SNP sources have told The Independent there is a “succession plan” in place to prevent Kate Forbes ever becoming leader.
Swinney announced on Thursday morning he would be running for SNP leadership before Forbes confirmed shortly after she would not be entering into any contest as she endorsed Swinney’s vision.
With no other SNP MSPs expected to throw their hat in the ring, Swinney is set to be crowed on Monday once nominations close and it is almost certain he will become first minister.
But SNP insiders have claimed the former deputy first minister is “only a stop-gap” option until Scots hit the polls in 2026 with Westminster group leader Flynn set to be parachuted in as the “long-term option” for leadership.
READ MORE: Mairi McAllan: Scottish independence is not dead
An SNP MP, who is an ally of outgoing First Minister Humza Yousaf, said: “Swinney has the authority, loved by the members, respected by officials. I would be content.
“And more crucially laser focused on what people’s concerns are, and not green obsessive nonsense. Crucially head and shoulders above anyone in that parliament (Holyrood).”
Asked who the long-term answer is, they said: “That would be Stephen Flynn.”
When it was pointed out that Flynn is in the wrong parliament with the SNP only accepting leaders based in Holyrood, the MP added: “He finds a way in 2026.”
Meanwhile, a friend of Forbes, said: “Sturgeon’s allies will do whatever they can to stop Kate. This is a ‘keep Kate out’ strategy and succession plan at all costs.”
Forbes caused some controversy in last year’s leadership contest when she expressed her views on gay marriage, which she is opposed to.
She also described having children out of wedlock as “wrong”.
Forbes said she believed it was “up to” individuals whether they had children outside of marriage but it was something she would “avoid”.
She added she would “celebrate” the birth of children outside of marriage “irrespective of the family”.
READ MORE: Allies praise 'selfless' Kate Forbes as she backs John Swinney
But despite her socially conservative views, she said she had a “groundswell” of support within the party to stand in a contest following Yousaf’s resignation earlier this week.
However, on Thursday afternoon she said in a statement shared a “powerful common purpose for our country” with Swinney and would support him in his bid.
She told STV News there had been no pressure placed on her not to stand.
Asked about whether there had been, she said: “No I don’t think that’s right.
“This was not about pressure to stand or not to stand. This was ultimately about whether or not a contest was in the best interest of the members of this party on the eve of a General Election and whether it was in the interests of the people of Scotland who want to see their government ensuring they are delivering economic growth, tackling poverty and delivering net zero.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel