LABOUR is “not planning alliances” with the SNP “or anyone”, the party’s national campaign co-ordinator has said.
Pat McFadden said a change in SNP leader “doesn’t make much difference” after Humza Yousaf announced his resignation as First Minister last Monday.
Asked if he “could imagine” Labour and the SNP working together if his party does not win a majority at a general election, McFadden told Sky News’s Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips “no”.
He said: “Our aim is to win a majority, to govern, to meet the mood for change, and we’re not planning any alliances or pacts with anyone.”
READ MORE: Labour slammed as party 'backs ALL measures in Tory Budget'
Phillips questioned if Labour would “rule-out the idea of co-operation” with the party and McFadden responded: “You can put it to me from now until Christmas and my answer will be the same, we’re going to aim for a majority government, we’re going to meet that mood for change, we’re not planning on any pacts or alliances with anyone and I think – after the results of the last few days – we go into that fight with no complacency, but with a belief and confidence that we’ve seen in the votes that were cast a few days ago.”
Former deputy first minister John Swinney could become SNP leader from Monday afternoon if he runs unopposed, with Swinney stating he would like to get on with that job “as quickly as possible”.
However, reports suggest a leadership battle may be on the cards after activist Graeme McCormick used the independence march in Glasgow to drum up support for his candidacy.
Asked if he would have been happier if the SNP had kept Yousaf as leader, McFadden said: “I don’t think it matters who the SNP leader is now, because I think there has been a big change.
“If there’s a contest or not, I don’t think it makes much difference because in Scotland just as in England there is a mood for change.
“In Scotland, just as in England, there is a tired government that has run out of steam and run out of ideas.
“One of the big changes that has happened, apart from the scandals surrounding the SNP over the last year, is the issue of lack of delivery of the basic job of the Government around health, education, and other services – which the SNP had shielded by keeping the constitutional issue on the boil year after year.
“That has now changed, people are looking at delivery and there is a mood for change which a party that has been in power as long as the SNP have cannot meet.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel