THE UK’s Eurovision entrant has said he has an “ambivalent” relationship with the “divisive” Union flag.
Olly Alexander, who will perform for the track Dizzy for the UK on Saturday in Malmo, has said the flag can be “nationalistic” and he hopes to be able to “reclaim” it in a “positive” way when he waves it at the parade.
The 33-year-old said: “When I’m going to be out there waving my flag… at the parade, it’s for all the good things that have come from growing up in the UK and being British.”
In March, Alexander came under pressure to withdraw from the competition after Queers for Palestine, a collective of more than 450 queer artists, wrote an open letter asking him and other performers to pull out of the contest in protest at Israel’s participation.
READ MORE: All Under One Banner announces details of next Scottish independence march
The contestants responded in a statement: “It is important to us to stand in solidarity with the oppressed and communicate our heartfelt wish for peace, an immediate lasting ceasefire, and the safe return of all hostages.
“We stand united against all forms of hate, including antisemitism and islamophobia.
“We firmly believe in the unifying power of music, enabling people to transcend differences and foster meaningful conversations and connections. We feel it is our duty to create and uphold this space, with a strong hope that it will inspire greater compassion and empathy.”
Alexander has previously signed a letter calling Israel an “apartheid regime” and condemned “Zionist propaganda” and Jewish campaigners called for him to be replaced as a Eurovision entrant.
The BBC said it would continue to let Alexander express his views.
If Alexander were to win on Saturday, it would be the first time a British entrant had claimed victory since 1997.
He is automatically through to the final as he represents one of “big five” countries.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel