CAMPAIGNERS have called for the “ludicrous” requirement for MSPs to declare service to the monarchy to be ditched after Humza Yousaf broke with tradition in his resignation letter to the King.
As he quit as first minister, Yousaf said in a letter to King Charles that “with my humble duty” he was writing to resign from office.
He added it “has been my pleasure to serve Your Majesty” but notably Yousaf – who is a republican - did not repeat his predecessor Nicola Sturgeon's words, as she wrote: “I have the honour to be, Sir, Your Majesty's humble and obedient servant."
According to Debrett’s, a London-based etiquette coaching company, the first line of a letter to the King should begin with the phrase “with my humble duty” but it should also end with: "I have the honour to remain, Sir, Your Majesty’s most humble and obedient servant”.
READ MORE: Former Tory minister introduces Rachel Reeves for economy speech
CEO of anti-monarchy Republic, Graham Smith, said he hoped John Swinney – who looks likely to be elected first minister on Tuesday – would take note of Yousaf’s “small step” towards ditching the “arcane” language MSPs are required to use towards the monarchy when they are elected.
After an election, MSPs are sworn in by taking an oath or affirmation with the oath being “I swear by Almighty God that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to His Majesty King Charles, his heirs and successors, according to law. So help me God".
Swinney has previously said he would prefer to keep the monarchy in the event of Scottish independence.
Asked what he thought of Yousaf toning down the language of Sturgeon’s letter, Smith told The National: “First ministers, like all politicians, should see themselves as servants of the people, not of an unelected monarch who represents no one but himself.
“Let’s hope [John] Swinney and others take note of this small step toward ditching this arcane language that is offensive to all our democratic values.”
Campaigners branded Sturgeon’s letter “deeply disturbing” last year with Scottish anti-monarchy group Our Republic calling out the “bizarre an anachronistic ritual that paints the head of Scotland's Government as no more than a servant of the King".
Tristan Gray, convener of Our Republic, said MSPs should be able to choose who to declare their loyalty to, adding that Yousaf’s letter still showed he had to tread a “bizarre middle-ground” as a republican.
READ MORE: Downing Street issues statement on UK university Gaza encampments
He said: “After the 2021 election many MSPs took the opportunity to protest the ludicrous, archaic, and anti-democratic requirement to declare their service to the monarchy before taking their seats as representatives in the Scottish Parliament.
“Nicola Sturgeon was one who did so, on behalf of her party, declaring her loyalty first to the Scottish people.
“For her [Sturgeon’s] resignation to have included a dedication as an ‘obedient servant; to the King was a shock, and cast doubt on the value of that earlier protest.
“Humza Yousaf, by contrast, has stayed true to this bizarre middle-ground our political representatives have been forced to tread. Both in doing their actual elected jobs as representing the people who elected them - and playing this pantomime act of subservience to a monarchy we now know, from polling this week, that Scots don't even want.
“It's long past time we put this charade behind us, and I hope we see the Scottish Parliament make a request to Westminster that the Scotland Act be amended so that Scottish Politicians can choose who they declare their loyalty to - and let the Scottish public judge them on that.”
Gray added he hoped Swinney would “bear in mind” his view of keeping the monarchy “is not the position held by most of his supporters or most Scots” in his own language should he take up the position of first minister.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel