THE UK will not stop sending arms to Israel amid an unfolding military incursion into Rafah in southern Gaza, the Prime Minister has insisted.
Rishi Sunak was challenged on the issue at Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs) on Wednesday by Stephen Flynn, the SNP’s leader at Westminster.
It came after the US took the decision to block a shipment of some 3500 bombs to Israel amid concerns about the impact of a major ground operation in southern Gaza.
READ MORE: 'We don’t have a boycott': Labour back selling arms to Israel
More than 1.2 million Palestinians displaced by Israeli actions in Gaza are currently sheltering in the city of Rafah, and UN secretary-general António Guterres has said an assault on the area would be “a strategic mistake, a political calamity and a humanitarian nightmare”.
Nevertheless, Israel has begun bombing the city, seized the Rafah border crossing, and the nation’s defence minister has said military operations will continue until Hamas is eliminated from the “entire Gaza strip”.
Flynn raised the issue at PMQs, and asked if the UK would follow the Americans’ lead and block arms shipments.
Flynn said: “As we await the imminent Israeli incursion into Rafah, where 1.2 million people are sheltering, including 600,000 children, it has been reported that the United States has paused an arms shipment to Israel.
“The UK will now follow suit, won't it?”
Responding, Sunak said the “UK Government doesn't itself directly provide arms or ship arms to Israel”.
While this is true, the Tory government does have the ability to prevent any and all arms exports from UK shores.
Sunak further said that his Government is “deeply concerned about a full military incursion of Rafah given the devastating humanitarian impact”.
Flynn responded: “Let’s be clear. The confidence that Israel has shown in its military ambitions in Rafah stems from the silence which has been shown from its allies on the frontbenches in this place and indeed elsewhere across the world.
“Now we know, we all know, that UK arms and tech has supported Israel's activities in Gaza and will be used in any attack on Rafah.
“Knowing that and the devastation which is going to occur, surely the time has come to end our complicity and to halt our own sales to Israel.”
READ MORE: UK civil servants ask to 'immediately' stop working on Israel arms exports
Sunak responded: “Of course, we take our defence export responsibilities extremely seriously, and that's why we operate one of the most robust licensing control regimes anywhere in the world.
“We periodically review advice on Israel's commitment to international humanitarian law, and ministers always act in accordance with that advice and that is crystal clear for the House to understand.
“Our position with regard to export licences following the most recent assessment is unchanged.”
Previously, court documents revealed that the Tory ministers David Cameron and Kemi Badenoch had approved UK arms exports to Israel just days after the Israeli military killed three British aid workers.
In April, more than 600 legal experts, including former Supreme Court president Brenda Hale, said the worsening situation in Gaza and the International Court of Justice’s conclusion that there is a “plausible risk of genocide” obliges the UK to suspend arms sales to the country.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel