KATE Forbes has been announced as Scotland’s Deputy First Minister as John Swinney unveils his new Cabinet.
She takes over the role from Shona Robison, who has resigned from the position but will remain in Cabinet.
However, Forbes’s appointment has upset some with the Scottish Greens pointing to “the appointment of a Deputy First Minister with deeply conservative views”.
READ MORE: AI deepfake video of John Swinney on Sky News goes viral on Twitter
Here’s what Swinney’s new deputy has said on a range of social issues.
Same-sex marriage
During last year’s SNP leadership contest, Forbes said she would have voted against gay marriage in Scotland.
In an interview with The Scotsman, she said she would not have supported equal marriage as a “matter of conscience” if she had been an MSP at the time.
She said: “I believe that it should be a conscience vote because of its profound significance in all mainstream faiths.
“I think for me, Angela Merkel is the example I would follow, I would have voted, as a matter of conscience, along the lines of a mainstream teaching in most major religions that marriage is between a man and a woman.
“But I would have respected and defended the democratic choice that was made. It is a legal right now and I am a servant of democracy, I am not a dictator.”
In a separate interview with BBC Radio Scotland, she said she was a “servant of democracy” and stressed that she would defend the “legal commitment” the country had made to equal marriage.
Abortion laws
In an interview with ITV, Forbes was asked if she supported the right to have an abortion under current laws.
She said: “I couldn’t conceive of having an abortion myself. I’ve seen my baby at 12 weeks and 20 weeks but yes, I defend the right of women to make use of that legal provision to access abortion.”
She was further asked if this meant she would defend the current law which allows women to have an abortion during the first 24 weeks of pregnancy.
READ MORE: Stephen Flynn gives perfect reaction to Natalie Elphicke's defection
“My position is that I wouldn’t change the law as it stands.”
Asked about legislation put forward by Green MSP Gillian Mackay (below) aiming to stop anti-abortion protesters from gathering outside clinics, Forbes commented: “I think with the bill the basis of my position is that nobody seeks a termination lightly.
“There are emotionally vulnerable women seeking these terminations and they should do so free of fear and harassment.
“In that sense, the purpose of the bill makes sense. Any bill that is good law needs to make sure its targeted and that’s where I’ve said I’m happy to work with [Mackay].”
The buffer zone legislation recently passed Stage 1 and Forbes voted in favour of the legislation.
Children out of wedlock
The new Deputy First Minister also previously said it was “up to” individuals whether they had children outside of marriage although said it was something she would “avoid”.
Asked by Sky News for her views on having children out of wedlock, she told the broadcaster: “It’s entirely up to them. It’s something that I would seek to avoid for me personally.
“But it doesn’t fuss me, it doesn’t put me up nor down. The choices that other people make is (up to them).
“In terms of my faith, my faith would say that sex is for marriage and that’s the approach I would practice.”
She added: “For me, it would be wrong according to my faith, but for you I have no idea what your faith is. So, in a free society you can do what you want.”
Gender reform
During the leadership race, Forbes (below) also said she would not have voted in favour of the Scottish Government’s Gender Reform Bill.
She told the BBC she had “significant concerns” about self-identification for transgender people in Scotland and said she was unlikely to launch a legal challenge against the UK Government for its use of a Section 35 order.
The Court of Session ultimately did rule the UK Government could block Scotland’s gender reforms from becoming law.
Forbes previously said: “I have been on record saying I had significant concerns and therefore the bill in its current form I would have struggled to vote for.
READ MORE: Edinburgh: Three arrests as pro-Palestine protesters blockade Leonardo factory
“I would not have been able to vote for the principle of self-ID.”
However, she added that she “understands the principle which is that the UK Government should not overturn Scottish legislation”.
What have the Greens said?
After John Swinney (below) was officially sworn in as Scotland’s seventh First Minister, the Greens called on him to reaffirm his support for a “fairer, greener, more equal Scotland”.
The party’s co-leader Patrick Harvie said: “There will be many people across our country who will be very concerned and who will want to know that this Scottish Government remains committed to a greener and more equal future for Scotland.
“When it comes to delivering fairer and more progressive taxation, a just transition from oil and gas and a watertight ban on so-called conversion therapy, it is vital that this government does not dilute the longstanding commitments that it has made.
“These are the values that the Scottish Greens remain committed to and that we will work for every day. The Scotland that we want to build is one where everyone is free to be themselves and where climate action is at the forefront of our politics.
“The First Minister must lay out his programme and his vision for Scotland, and where these values lie within it.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel