DAVID Cameron has once again refused to say the UK will suspend arms sales to Israel, claiming it would not be a “wise path”.
The Foreign Secretary did however say that it would be wrong for Israel to launch a full-scale invasion of Rafah “without a plan to protect people”.
Residents in Gaza’s southern-most city have been told to evacuate amid a further sign the Israeli military is preparing for a ground incursion.
READ MORE: David Pratt: Gaza fallout is as much diplomatic as humanitarian
The US has already threatened to halt the supply of offensive weapons to Israel should it carry out an attack on Rafah and the UK is under pressure to do the same.
Speaking to the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg show, the Foreign Secretary (below) said: “The United States is a massive, bulk, state supplier of weapons to Israel, including 1000lb bombs and all the rest of it.
“The UK provides less than 1% of Israel’s weapons and it’s not a state supplier. We have a licensing system and those licences can be closed if it’s judged there’s a serious risk of a serious international human rights violation.”
He further pointed out that he was urged to declare an immediate arms embargo a few months ago, “and the very next thing that happened, just a few days later, was a massive Iranian attack on Israel”.
“I don’t think it would have been a wise path, and I still don’t think it would be a wise path,” he said, adding it would only “strengthen Hamas”.
The UK’s arms exports regime would prevent the supply of weapons to Israel if there is a “clear risk that the items might be used to commit or facilitate a serious violation of international humanitarian law”, he said.
The US State Department on Friday said there was “reasonable” evidence that Israel had breached international law protecting civilians.
Asked whether it would be wrong for Israel to carry out a Rafah offensive, the Foreign Secretary told Sky News’s Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips: “That’s right, without a plan to protect people.
“For there to be a major offensive in Rafah there would have to be an absolutely clear plan about how you save lives, how you move people out the way, how you make sure they’re fed, you make sure that they have medicine and shelter and everything, We have seen no such plan… so we don’t support an offensive in that way.”
The Tory peer also said he was “always pushing” the Israelis on a hostage deal and achieving a pause in the fighting to seek a sustainable ceasefire, while he urged the nation to “do better on” allowing humanitarian aid into the war-torn territory.
But the real pressure should be on Hamas, he added.
“Hamas have been offered a deal which would release hundreds of prisoners from Israeli jails, that would provide a pause in the fighting to get desperately-needed aid into Gaza, and they’re not taking that deal.”
Israel’s limited operation in Rafah, which it has said is Hamas’s last significant stronghold, has ramped up in recent days. It argues it must invade to dismantle the group and return hostages.
Lord Cameron said putting British boots on the ground in Gaza as part of international efforts to deliver aid would be “a risk that we shouldn’t take”.
It came after recent reports that the Government was considering deploying troops to land humanitarian supplies from a temporary pier being built by the US military.
The US said no American forces would go ashore, and personnel from another country would drive the delivery trucks carrying aid from the pier.
The Foreign Secretary told the BBC: “The view the Prime Minister took, and I took and others took, was actually putting British boots on to the beach was not a good move.”
READ MORE: Eurovision final: Ireland's Bambie Thug hits out at organisers amid Israel row
Lord Cameron said it would “probably be via a contractor”.
He added: “I think there might be specific targeting of British or American troops and so I think it’s a wise decision.”
He also said the UK would not resume funding to the UN relief agency UNRWA before investigations were complete into whether its workers colluded with Hamas.
The United Nations’ agency for Palestinian refugees, the main provider of aid in Gaza, was investigated over claims that some of its staff had links with the militant group, but the outcome of a probe was enough for other countries such as Canada and Australia to restore their cashflow.
“I’m being more demanding,” he said, adding that he wanted to see “real undertakings” from UNRWA “that they are going to investigate these things properly, that it won’t happen again, that (they are) changing their procedures and everything else, because you can’t expect us to pile back in and start funding an organisation when some of its own workers were involved on October 7”.
Meanwhile, Labour frontbencher Jonathan Ashworth (above) said the UK “should be pausing arms sales in order to stop any arms that would be used in that Rafah offensive”.
The shadow paymaster general told Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips: “We do not want this Rafah offensive to go ahead, it would be completely catastrophic.
“The Americans have said they are not going to hand over arms which could be used in a Rafah offensive. I am saying that we should adopt a similar position.
“We should not sell British-made weapons or components that should be used in this Rafah offensive.”
Greens response
Responding to Cameron's comments, Scottish Greens MSP Ross Greer (below) accused Cameron of playing a "truly shameful and complicit role in the destruction in Gaza".
"Israeli forces have committed atrocity after atrocity, including some of the most appalling war crimes of the 21st century.
"They are rightly being investigated for genocide by the International Criminal Court, but the Foreign Secretary has made excuses and allowed the arms sales to continue.
“1.5 million people are trapped in Rafah. They have nowhere to go and are being bombed by one of the world’s most powerful militaries, which is using some of the most deadly weapons ever produced.
"UK arms export law could not be clearer, but the UK Government simply doesn't care.
“The reality is that the UK should never have been arming Israel in the first place, not with its decades long record of brutal apartheid, state violence and war crimes against the people of Palestine.
“How many more children need to be killed before David Cameron and Rishi Sunak are finally forced to say that enough is enough?"
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel