KEIR Starmer has said there will be “no watering down” of the New Deal for Workers despite union bosses calling the latest draft “unrecognisable”.
The Labour Party leader said he's “absolutely committed” to a new deal for working people regardless of Unite the Union saying his party is “rowing back on its pledges” after reviewing the latest draft of the proposals.
Starmer and the Scottish Labour group have pledged a New Deal for Working People should they come into power at Westminster after the next General Election.
These policy promises included a ban on zero-hours contracts and introducing parental leave and sick pay from day one which Starmer has said, “will be the biggest levelling up of workers’ rights in a generation”.
READ MORE: Scottish Labour fury as Keir Starmer waters down workers' rights plan
He also promised “there will be no watering down” of the proposed pledges after the Scottish Trades Union Congress (STUC), Scotland’s leading trade unionist which represents more than half a million members, warned the new deal should be delivered “in full, without equivocation”.
When asked about the New Deal Starmer said: “I think people should always be treated with dignity and respect at work but I also think it’s essential for economic growth, because every good employer knows that to get better economic growth we need to treat our workforce properly.”
He also said the plan presents “no threat” to business owners and added that “good employers are doing much of this already”.
“So, no watering down, 100% committed to it – and it is about respect and dignity but it’s also a story about economic growth and taking our country forward,” he added.
Speaking at the UK Labour Party’s conference last year Angela Rayner pledged to personally implement the plans of the New Deal within 100 days of taking office.
However, the FT previously reported that senior Labour officials said they would not implement the proposals within 100 days, but instead intend only table draft legislation within that period.
The same report also said Labour would not completely ban zero-hours contracts and parental leave will not be brought in “from day one”, but rather only consulted on.
Responding to the most recent draft of the documents last week, the leader of Unite Sharon Graham, said the New Deal for Workers is “unrecognisable” compared to the original proposals.
Unite the Union leader Sharon Graham has previously stated the New Deal proposals have already drastically changed
She said: “It looks like all the warnings Unite made earlier about the dangers of Labour rowing back on its pledges for the New Deal for Workers have been proved right.
“This new Labour document on the New Deal, issued to the unions on Monday, is a row back on a row back.
“It is totally unrecognisable from the original proposals produced with the unions. Unrecognisable. Workers will see through this and mark this retreat after retreat as a betrayal.
“This new document is turning what was a real new deal for workers into a charter for bad bosses.
READ MORE: STUC cautions Labour against 'weakening workers' rights pledges'
“Labour don’t want a law against fire and rehire, and they are effectively ripping up the promise of legislation on a new deal for workers in its first 100 days.
“Instead, we have codes of conduct and pledges of consultation with big business. Likewise, the proposal to legislate against zero-hour contracts is watered down to almost nothing.
“In truth this new document is not worthy of discussion.
“All unions must now demand that Labour changes course and puts the original New Deal for Workers back on the table.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel