AN MSP has written to Scotland’s Chief Constable after a National journalist was threatened with arrest by an officer.
Xander Elliards was covering a major protest which saw clashes between the police and protesters at the Thales site in Govan.
The National’s content editor was standing roughly 100m from the demonstration when he was confronted by an officer who claimed he was being “obstructive to the police”.
READ MORE: Jo Farrell appointed Police Scotland's first female Chief Constable
During the confrontation recorded by Elliards – which took place in a public street – the officer claimed he didn’t have “free roam to go about protest sites” and suggested he could be arrested under Section 20 of the Police and Fire Reform Act.
Maggie Chapman – who is also the Scottish Greens' parliamentary justice spokesperson said it was a “concerning interaction”.
The MSP for North East Scotland added that freedom of the press is “vital for a functional democracy” and shared a letter on Twitter/X that she wrote to Police Scotland’s Chief Constable Jo Farrell (below).
Freedom of the Press is vital for a functional democracy.
— Maggie Chapman MSP (@MaggieChapman) May 16, 2024
Today I wrote to the Chief Constable of @PoliceScotland following the release of footage (link ⬇️) showing a concerning interaction between an officer & journalist.
Our journalists must be able to cover important events! pic.twitter.com/5g7Px1JE97
Chapman said that in light of the incident, she is seeking “urgent replies” from Police Scotland to the following questions: “What measures have been put in place to ensure that police are protecting the right to free speech by protestors, and the freedom of the press?
“What training have the officers policing these protests received to ensure that they are not violating the rights of individuals participating in protest or those of journalists reporting on the same in the public interest?
“What actions are being taken by Police Scotland in relation to this incident and to wider concerns about the way in which this protest was policed, in light of the principle of policing by consent?”
Chapman added: “I look forward to hearing from you as a matter of urgency.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel