HOME Secretary James Cleverly is facing demands from the Scottish Government to stop rounding up asylum seekers in Scotland to be deported to Rwanda.
Scotland’s Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville has written to the Home Secretary to demand that no more asylum seekers are detained for deportation.
It comes after The National revealed an asylum seeker in Glasgow had been detained and taken to England as the Home Office began rounding up migrants ahead of the launch of flights to Rwanda.
Abdullah Salimi, 21, was last reported to be held at the Colnbrook Immigration Removal Centre on the outskirts of London.
His MP, Anne McLaughlin (above), has claimed she has been stonewalled by the Home Office as she sought information about his wellbeing. She has also said she suspects he was taken to England to deny him access to legal aid – something the UK Government has denied.
In a letter published on Friday, Somerville said: “I would welcome an urgent discussion to clarify what action the UK Government is planning to take to reassure communities; how they are safeguarding the rights of individuals and confirmation that no further action is planned to detain people resident in Scotland for potential removal to Rwanda.”
READ MORE: Fears Glasgow asylum seeker could be deported to Rwanda after shock detention
She also alleged that a previous letter she had sent to Cleverly about the details of immigration enforcement in Scotland had gone unanswered.
In her previous letter, sent in April, Somerville (above) said she had sought information on the “cohort” the Home Office was targeting in Scotland, the numbers of people resident in Scotland who have already been detained and how many people the department planned to detain.
The Social Justice Secretary also said she had sought assurances asylum seekers in Scotland would not be removed from their homes.
She wrote: “This situation is intolerable both for the individuals concerned and for the wider community.
“It is essential that the UK Government respects the rights of individuals, including their ability to access advice and support.
READ MORE: Rwanda scheme 'wasted two working weeks' of parliamentary time, figures show
“It is vital that individuals can continue to access legal advice and action is taken to ensure that moving individuals from Scotland to detention centres in England does not disrupt their access to legal advice.
“I am also concerned about the impact of this action on communities across Scotland and on the organisations that are working to support those communities.”
The Scottish Government believes the Rwanda scheme serves to “abdicate the UK’s moral and international responsibilities to recognise and support refugees”, Somerville said while adding that she believed it would not deter migrants from crossing the Channel in small boats.
She told Cleverly (above): “I recognise that immigration enforcement and detention is a reserved issue but the Scottish Government is responsible for community safety and wellbeing in Scotland.
“The action that the Home Office has taken is not in line with the values of the people of Scotland.
“It is right that immigration is controlled and we recognise the need for enforcement. However, targeting vulnerable individuals seeking refuge is not about safeguarding our communities instead it is causing anxiety and distress.”
The Home Office was approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel