A WOMAN who was dismissed by a charity that supports survivors of sexual violence because she held "gender critical" beliefs has won her tribunal case.
Roz Adams was dismissed by Edinburgh Rape Crisis Centre (ERCC) over her views on gender has now won her case at the Employment Tribunal.
A judge found that the centre’s chief executive, Mridul Wadhwa, was behind a “heresy hunt” against Adams because of her beliefs.
Adams had at first welcomed the centre’s trans-inclusive policies, the tribunal heard. However, in December 2020, the rape centre worker went for a walk with Maggie Chapman, Green MSP for North East Scotland, who was then the chief operating officer for ERCC.
The judgment stated: “This was the first time that [Adams] heard what she described … as the ‘mantra’ that ‘trans women are women’.
READ MORE: Scottish Government issue statement on gender bill after John Swinney interview
“She felt concerned that there was no real definition or clarification associated with this statement. She felt it was odd.
“Once she started work she felt it became more and more apparent that there were issues regarding the way that gender issues were dealt with in the organisation … She described things around the issue as being ‘eggshelly’.”
The panel heard that a particular issue for Adams, referred to as the claimant, was what to say to service users who wanted to be sure that they would be seen by someone who was biologically a woman.
In June 2022, she received an email from an abuse survivor, who wanted to know whether the person she was going to see was a man or a woman, and sought guidance from her superiors about how to respond.
Disciplinary proceedings against Adams then started in late June 2022, although the tribunal said it could not establish the precise chain of events that let to this.
The employment judge, Ian McFatridge, said Mridul Wadhwa, who is ERCC chief executive and a trans woman, was a key figure in an internal investigation that “should not have been launched in the first place”.
He said the review “was clearly motivated by a strong belief among senior management and some of the claimant’s colleagues that the claimant’s views were inherently hateful”.
McFatridge added: “It is clear that [Wadhwa] was involved in the process since she was the one who selected and contacted who would deal with the various stages of the disciplinary and grievance process.”
After the ruling Adams said: “With relief, I welcome the ruling of the employment tribunal.
"They unanimously found that Edinburgh Rape Crisis Centre (ERCC) unlawfully discriminated against me on the grounds of my sex-realist belief and constructively unfairly dismissed me.
“This is a victory for all people who have been subjected to sexual violence who need a choice of worker, and group support on the basis of sex in order to feel safe.”
She added: “It is tragic to me that this ended in tribunal. For three years I consistently offered to enable discussion and I firmly believe that we will only find solutions that work for everyone through fearless, respectful, well-informed dialogue. I hope this ruling supports that to happen wherever it is needed.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel