THE UK Government has said it does not believe the International Criminal Court (ICC) has jurisdiction in Israel after it announced it was seeking an arrest warrant for Benjamin Netanyahu.
It was announced on Monday that the ICC is seeking arrest warrants for the Israeli Prime Minister, his defence minister Yoav Gallant and a number of senior Hamas figures.
Speaking in the Commons, deputy foreign secretary Andrew Mitchell said the Government wants to bring an end to fighting in Gaza but that seeking these warrants was not the best way to do so.
READ MORE: Stephen Flynn warns UK 'complicit' as ICC seeks Netanyahu arrest warrant
He said the UK Government continues to believe the best way to do so is to secure a deal for hostages to be freed and “allow for a pause in the fighting”.
Mitchell (below) said: “This Government wants to bring the conflict to a sustainable end as soon as possible, but as so often with conflicts of this nature the question is not about our desire for peace, but rather about the best means of achieving it.
“We continue to believe that the fastest way to end the conflict is to secure a deal which gets the hostages out and allows for a pause in fighting in Gaza.”
He continued to say the UK would then work with international partners “to turn that pause into a sustainable, permanent ceasefire”.
“Building momentum towards a lasting peace will require a number of elements including removing Hamas’ capacity to launch attacks against Israel,” he added.
READ MORE: ICC: David Cameron told to resign for supporting Benjamin Netanyahu
“A deal with Hamas for a pause in the fighting would involve exchanging hundreds of Palestinian prisoners charged with serious acts of terrorism, in return for the hostages’ release.
“I do not underestimate how difficult this must be for the Israeli government but it is the best way forward we see right now.
“We continue to work closely with the United States and partners in the region to support such a deal, and we do not believe that the ICC prosecutor seeking warrants will help in this regard. As we have said from the outset, we do not think the ICC has jurisdiction in this case.”
Green MP Caroline Lucas described the statement as “outrageous,” saying the UK was “undermining the authority of the ICC”.
“The ICC has jurisdiction in relation to any alleged crimes committed in Gaza and in the West Bank.
“All involved must uphold international law.”
Meanwhile, speaking in the Commons, the SNP’s foreign affairs spokesperson Brendon O’Hara said: “We go down a dangerous road, minister, if we believe that the rule of law is something from which a government can pick and choose.”
He said the SNP “very much welcome” the ICC’s decision to seek the arrest warrants for both senior Hamas and Israeli officials.
“We have always unreservedly condemned the appalling Hamas attacks, the murders and the hostage-taking and we repeat our calls for the immediate release of the hostages.
“Given the ferociously disproportionate Israeli response, one which has seen 35,000 dead, 100,000 injured, tens of thousands of children orphaned, a civilian infrastructure in ruins, the cutting off of food, water, electricity and medical supplies, we also welcome the ICC filing applications for the arrest warrants of both Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the minister of defence Yoav Gallant for war crimes and crimes against humanity,” the MP added.
READ MORE: ICC: What does the arrest warrant for Benjamin Netanyahu mean?
O’Hara continued: “The ICC say they have evidence, including interviews with survivors and eyewitnesses which show Israel has intentionally and systematically deprived the civilian population of Gaza with what they need to survive and they refer specifically to Israel using starvation as a weapon of war and intentionally directing attacks against a civilian population, all acts which constitute a crime against humanity.”
He continued: "For eight months, this Government has told us it cannot make an assessment on breaches of international humanitarian law. But it has today, because it suits them, made an immediate assessment on the decision of the ICC, whose panel of experts is predominantly made up of UK lawyers.
"And they've done so simply because it doesn't agree with it. It is shameful and unforgivable that for eight months this Government has chosen to deny the evidence of their own eyes and given political cover and munitions to Israel.
"And we have to assume that if today doesn't put an end to the UK licensing of arms exports to Israel, then sadly, absolutely nothing will."
Following the news from the ICC, the SNP’s Westminster leader Stephen Flynn (above) warned the UK is “complicit” in the death of thousands in Gaza.
“Both the UK Government and the Labour Party must stand by international law and, whilst this application for an arrest warrant is determined, confirm that they will both fully support the final determination that is made by the court.”
The Scottish Greens meanwhile have called for Foreign Secretary David Cameron to resign for backing Netanyahu.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel