CREATIVE Scotland knew a controversial theatre project would include “a scene with genital contact” nine months before almost £85,000 of public money was awarded, documents have revealed.
The public arts body has since withdrawn the funding for the “hardcore” Rein project which was recruiting actors to participate in “non-simulated” sex scenes.
The Rein project was awarded £84,555 in January despite the application in March 2023 outlining plans for “genital contact” and a “sex party”.
READ MORE: More Scots than ever identifying as 'Scottish, not British', new census data finds
Creative Scotland is now seeking reimbursement of this award, stating the project was “considerably more explicit” than first thought and breached the contract.
However, it is not looking to draw back £23,210 for a research and development (R&D) phase of the project produced in August 2022 which said “explicit sex acts” would not be performed, but stated a final performance was expected to.
In a statement, Creative Scotland has said they were “always aware” of the explicitness of the application, but said it was not clear until March 2024 that the project was moving from “performance to unsimulated sex”.
An advertisement for participants in March took the project to an “unacceptable territory” by including “unsimulated sex”, a spokeswoman said.
But the application obtained through freedom of information requests, and seen by the PA news agency, revealed the explicit contents of the application were revealed to the public body, including nude actors as part of the 40-minute theatre installation.
In the project description, the application states: “In our initial short R&D phase we had a no genital contact rule. In this development phase we will work on a sex scene with genital contact with three of the cast.”
READ MORE: John Swinney warned SNP voters want climate change to remain top priority
Application assessors were also presented with visual mood boards of the project.
A Creative Scotland spokeswoman said: “We were always aware the project would be explicit and creatively challenging, but it was not clear until the project issued the call out for participants on its website, that the project was moving from performance to unsimulated sex.
“It was at this point that Creative Scotland felt that there had been a breach of contract, and this breach of contract was not disputed by the applicant.
“Creative work, across many art forms, can feature explicit depictions of sex. But there is a difference between that depiction and actual sex, which is not appropriate for public funding.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel