SCOTTISH Tory leader Douglas Ross’s bill aimed at guaranteeing treatment for people suffering with drugs or alcohol problems may actually “increase the harms” people face, a leading expert group has said.
On Wednesday, the Scottish Drugs Forum (SDF) published its response to Ross’s “Right to Addiction Recovery Bill”, raising “significant concerns”.
SDF chief executive Kirsten Horsburgh welcomed “discussion” around how best to tackle Scotland’s drugs deaths crisis, but suggested the Conservatives’ bill was not the best route forward.
READ MORE: Drug experts 'keeping shtum' despite concerns about Tories' right to recovery bill
“We have considered the proposals and have concerns that overall they are insufficient to deliver the radical change required to adequately increase the number of people receiving the treatment that they request and crucially, the quality of that treatment,” Horsburgh said.
A briefing published by the SDF said: “SDF has significant concerns that the bill, as proposed, may be counterproductive in many areas and, through unintended consequences, may increase the harms faced by people experiencing drug-related problems.”
The Conservatives have claimed the bill can be a “game-changer”. If passed, it would make it a legal guarantee for a person diagnosed with a dependency or “addiction” issue to receive treatment within three weeks.
The issues about the Tories’ bill raised by the SDF include:
- Treatment cannot be provided on the basis described in the bill
- The relationship between the service/health professional and the patient is threatened by the bill
- NHS budgeting would be challenged
- The bill is not a means to expand the capacity of treatment options available
- The decision about treatment remains wholly with the health professional and the patient is not empowered
- The bill does not confer new rights for patients
- The decision about which treatment patients are to be offered is unlikely to be changed by the bill
Giving one positive, the SDF report did say that the fact that the Tories’ bill “proposes better information collecting and reporting about treatment” is to be “broadly welcomed”.
The intervention from the SDF comes after The Sunday National reported that some expert groups were keeping “shtum” rather than criticise the Tories’ bill for fear of backlash.
Peter Krykant, a prominent drugs reform campaigner who now works with the charity Cranstoun, called the bill a “smokescreen of compassion”.
He said: “My worry is that the SNP could potentially look to back this because in the face of it and from a public-facing, media perspective, ‘everybody has a right now in law to addiction recovery’.
“In actual fact, it's unworkable, over costly, won't help the people that it is designed to help, and actually it’s stigmatising.”
The Scottish Conservatives have been approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel