TORY MSPs “prejudiced” the committee probe into Michael Matheson and so the SNP will not support its recommendation of sanctions, First Minister John Swinney has said.
The SNP leader called out Annie Wells, the Tory MSP who recommended the 27-day suspension for Matheson, after her party leader Douglas Ross raised the issue of Matheson’s sanctions at First Minister’s Questions.
Earlier on Thursday, the Holyrood standards committee announced that it had unanimously backed docking Matheson’s pay for 54 days after he lied about an £11,000 iPad bill.
It also backed – but not unanimously – Wells’s call for a 27-day suspension.
The recommendations will have to be approved by parliament, and Swinney was asked if he would back them.
🗣️ 'I believe this process has prejudiced'
— The National (@ScotNational) May 23, 2024
Watch as John Swinney says he will not back the sanctions recommended against Michael Matheson at today's FMQs pic.twitter.com/Z7j9edqKKt
Ross said: “When the scandal came to light, the SNP circled the wagons and backed him to the hilt. They said he was a person of integrity and character.
“The SNP said this matter was closed, but they must surely accept the full scale of the deceit and abuse of trust.”
He added: “So will John Swinney do the right thing and kick Michael Matheson out of the SNP?
“And does the First Minister accept that the SNP were wrong to fully support Michael Matheson?”
READ MORE: Tory councillor planted as 'warehouse worker' in Rishi Sunak campaign visit
Responding, Swinney said: “I have to make clear to Parliament that Michael Matheson is a friend and a colleague of mine.
“He has made mistakes. He has resigned from the Cabinet and he paid the roaming costs in question. There has been no cost to the public purse.
“But as I consider the findings from the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee, I have a significant concern.
“I believe this process has been prejudiced, and let me explain why.
“Stephen Kerr and Annie Wells both made comments about this case, long before it came to the committee, that prejudged the case.
“Stephen Kerr (below) had the good grace to admit that he could not, and I quote, could not meet the committee requirement to be unbiased, so he removed himself from the committee.
“He was replaced by Oliver Mundell, who made no public comment on this case, and I have no issue with Mr Mundell’s participation in the inquiry.
“But Annie Wells did make public comments. On November 27, Annie Wells said that Michael Matheson’s, and I quote, desperate efforts to justify his outrageous expenses claim have been riddled with lies, cover ups and the need for us all to suspend our disbelief.
“If a constituent came to me and said they were about to face a disciplinary panel at work and one of its members had made prejudicial comments about them, I would come down on that employer like a tonne of bricks.
“That is the situation that Michael Matheson is facing here, and that is why I will not be supporting this sanction.”
READ MORE: Labour campaign chief can't name 'one Scottish-specific policy' in BBC interview
In response, Ross said the Tories would look to bring a motion to parliament calling on Matheson to resign his seat.
He said that the motion would be brought to Holyrood for a vote "next week".
Scottish Labour's Anas Sarwar also hit out at Swinney for his decision to back Matheson, claiming the SNP leader had demeaned his office within two weeks of taking power.
The Scottish LibDems have also called for Matheson to resign his seat.
There is currently no way to remove an MSP until the next Holyrood election, unless they voluntarily resign.
At Westminster, a recall petition is triggered if an MP is suspended from the Commons for more than 10 days.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel