REFORM UK have had to remove more than 100 general election candidates since the start of the year, after more than a dozen of whom were sacked after offensive and racist comments were revealed.
The populist party is now under pressure to meet its pledge to stand a full slate of candidates. It needs to select for as many as 160 constituencies before the cut-off point for nominations in 14 days.
An analysis of Reform’s candidate listings by the campaigning organisation Hope Not Hate found that as many as 110 seats had seen their Reform UK candidates dropped or swapped since January. In four seats, two different candidates were dropped.
READ MORE: Keir Starmer 'running scared' with 'demands' to cut SNP from TV debates
Reform maintains that 80% of those dropped or replaced were cases of people being inactive or unable to commit to the July election.
It comes after the party apologised last month after a candidate who had died was deselected for being “inactive”.
More than a dozen Reform prospective parliamentary candidates (PCCs) have been dropped in recent months after past utterances were revealed by the media, campaigners or members of the public.
The National told how a Scottish candidate for the party was suspended for making pro-cannibalism comments and saying the human race should be “obliterated”.
We also revealed the party is standing a candidate in the upcoming election who declared himself the “prophet of a new age” and who wanted to subsidise brothel visits for civil servants.
The party said it accepts that, in many cases, those standing may be “paper” candidates as limited resources are thrown into a number of target seats.
READ MORE: Michael Gove announces he will not stand at the General Election
It received a blow this week when Nigel Farage announced that he would not be standing.
Reform’s leader, Richard Tice, is standing in Boston and Skegness in Lincolnshire.
Georgie Laming, director of campaigns at Hope Not Hate, said: “Reform UK’s claims of being election ready are transparently untrue. Not only do they not have a full slate of candidates selected, but the candidates they do have are time and time again exposed as racists, conspiracy theorists and extremists.”
A Reform UK spokesperson said: “We are quite certain that we will be able to have a full slate of candidates. It’s a pledge we have made.
“Some of the candidates may be paper ones, but the vast majority are very keen. Because of what has happened in recent months we have been more strict with vetting.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel