ANAS Sarwar has hit the headlines over his apparent confusion about whether workers at a firm linked to him are paid at least the real living wage.
During an interview with the BBC’s Sunday Show, Sarwar claimed his family business - United Wholesale Scotland - does not pay all of its workers the real living wage and was met with fierce criticism for doing so.
However, the union representing the workers has since released a statement saying the opposite.
READ MORE: SNP replace General Election candidate in Lothian East at last minute
Here’s all you need to know.
What is United Wholesale Scotland?
According to its own website, United Wholesale (Scotland) is a “cash and carry” business which supplies customers with a range of products.
This ranges from frozen food items to tobacco to grocery products and the company has a range of depots, including in Pollokshields and on the M9 between Grangemouth and Falkirk.
The original business was founded by Mohammed Sarwar, father to Anas, and his brother Ramzan in the 1970s.
However, the Scottish Labour leader sold all of his shares in the family business in 2017 but his wife, mother and children all continue to benefit from the profits of the firm.
Why is it back in the news?
Speaking on the BBC’s Sunday Show, Sarwar was pressed on whether or not the business does not pay workers the real living wage.
After repeatedly dodging the question, he eventually said that “I don’t believe that every single staff member is on the real living wage”.
The SNP’s longest serving MP described the admission as “shocking” while Stephen Flynn was also among those to criticise Sarwar.
What has the union said?
In spite of Sarwar’s comments, the union representing workers at United Wholesale Scotland insisted workers are in fact paid at least the real living wage.
READ MORE: Ash Regan: Is a change from Tories to Labour the extent of ambition?
A spokesperson for Usdaw said: “Usdaw has a trade union recognition agreement with United Wholesale Scotland and we negotiate on pay with the company.
“In our last negotiation we agreed a pay deal that delivered an income higher than the real living wage for all employees.”
Has this issue come up before?
This is far from the first time this topic has proved difficult for Sarwar (below), having previously had to speak on the issue during his run to be Scottish Labour leader in 2017.
At the time, there was similar criticism over the allegations that the business did not pay all staff the real living wage.
As a result, Sarwar relinquished all shares in the business and signed a discretionary trust deed which meant he could never access the assets.
In October 2023, the story came up once again as the Scottish Labour leader was branded a hypocrite with reports that the business still did not pay the real living wage.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel