SCOTTISH Labour have defended the think-tank boss who said people smugglers should be sent to live on a barge in Scotland as a “fantastic” General Election candidate just months after briefing that he is “an irrelevant dobber” who should be ignored.
Scottish Labour issued a statement defending John Simons’s selection in the safe Labour seat of Makerfield in Greater Manchester on Thursday – just three months after categorically insisting: “Josh Simons’s views do not represent the Labour Party.”
In February, Simons made headlines after saying smuggler gangs helping people to cross the English Channel should be placed on a barge, adding: “And then ship the barge up to the north of Scotland for all I care. Who cares?”
'Why don't you put the smuggler gangs on the barge and ship it to Scotland for all I care?'
— LBC (@LBC) February 12, 2024
Criticising the government's Rwanda plan, @joshsimonstweet has a solution for the 'small boats crisis' if Labour win the next election.
@IainDale pic.twitter.com/rZrGJmaoSB
Amid the backlash, Scottish Labour tried to distance themselves from Simons, the director of the Labour Together think tank established by prominent frontbenchers including shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves and shadow health secretary Wes Streeting.
A party spokesperson said at the time: “Every party has elements on the fringes that give them moments of cringe. This is a ludicrous comment and we couldn’t be clearer – Josh Simon’s views do not represent the Labour Party.
“People making stupid comments like this are best ignored. Labour will scrap the Tories’ immoral and unworkable Rwanda plan and tackle criminal gangs.”
Scots Labour group leader Anas Sarwar gave a strikingly similar quote to the Daily Record, saying: “My first reaction is ‘who?’ Every party has elements on the fringes that give them moments of cringe.
“I think people that are making stupid, flippant comments like that are best ignored.”
And one senior Labour figure told The Times that Simons was “an irrelevant dobber”.
Scottish Labour found themselves undermined just one month later after it was revealed that Simons’s Labour Together think tank had provided an aide to support shadow Scottish secretary Ian Murray.
Following his selection, the SNP have brought up Simons’s comments from February in a renewed attack on the party.
SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn said: “Labour have selected a candidate who said that gangs should be put on a barge and shipped to the north of Scotland.
“At the time, Anas Sarwar said ‘he doesn’t represent the Labour Party’.
“Well, he does now.”
READ MORE: Labour condemned as candidate 'not endorsed' in row over social media posts
In response, Scottish Labour have stood by Simons, calling him a “fantastic” candidate.
A Scottish Labour spokesperson said: “This desperate SNP attack is proof the party is well and truly out of positive ideas on how to deliver the change Scotland needs.
“Instead of worrying about a months-old interview by a candidate in Makerfield, the SNP should focus on fixing the chaos it has made in Scotland – from sky-high NHS waiting lists to a flatlining economy.
“Labour has selected a fantastic group of candidates in place for the General Election on Thursday 4 July.
“It’s clear that only Labour has a real plan to deliver the change that Scotland needs – by cutting bills, boosting pay, growing our economy and renewing public services.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel