A FURIOUS crowd in Perth confronted a Tory candidate who appeared to suggest the SNP were “anti-English”.
At a campaign event in the Fair City, Luke Graham complained about the SNP branding itself as an “internationalist party” as he suggested SNP MPs in the House of Commons express their dislike for “other people on the islands of Great Britain”.
“What I can’t stand is that when you get to the kind of SNP position which is ‘we’re an internationalist party, we want to be reaching out to everyone’, SNP MPs sit in Parliament all the time [saying] ‘we love everyone else’ apart from the other people on the islands of Great Britain,” said Graham.
The crowd immediately took issue with Graham’s comments with one man saying he found it “insulting” he had described SNP voters as “anti-English”.
“I’m anti-Westminster because I think it’s a shambles,” the man went on.
Watch Perth & Kinross-shire Tory candidate - Luke Graham - in a head on collision with the people of Perth. pic.twitter.com/FkAYZs3DGP
— TRADASRO 🏴 (@tradasro) May 30, 2024
Graham – who was an MP for Ochil and South Perthshire between 2017 and 2019 – then denied that he had described the SNP in this way which attracted more annoyance in the crowd.
He said: “I didn’t say the SNP were anti-English, I said they are anti-Westminster because they can’t co-govern on our islands.
READ MORE: Lorna Slater hits back as SNP say climate target 'never achievable'
“I did not say anti-English. I didn’t say that. That’s a fact. We can watch the video tape back that’s why we’re recording it.”
After losing his seat in 2019, Graham was made head of Boris Johnson’s Union Unit.
He was subsequently sacked from the role in February 2021 after a “brutal” row over indyref2.
The Financial Times reported he clashed with Oliver Lewis who briefly took over what Government officials described as a “beefed-up union unit”.
Lewis unexpectedly left the role after two weeks with reports saying he felt his position was being made “untenable” by others in No 10.
Graham is aiming to get a seat back in the Commons by contesting the new Perth and Kinross-shire constituency against SNP veteran Pete Wishart.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel