LABOUR have come under fire for "parachuting" in General Election candidates for Wales at the last-minute.
Plaid Cymru Westminster leader Liz Saville-Roberts said there are now several examples of “local Labour voices being completely ignored by the UK leadership”.
Torsten Bell, who runs London-based think tank the Resolution Foundation and has no connection to Wales, has been made the Labour candidate for the safe Swansea West seat.
The decision was taken out of the hands of the local constituency Labour party and delegated to the national executive committee (NEC), much to the disgust of local activists.
Meanwhile, a move to select Alex Barros-Curtis as the party’s candidate in Cardiff West has also been met with anger.
READ MORE: Labour red faced after basic Scottish geography blunder
A key aide to Keir Starmer, Barros-Curtis is UK Labour’s executive director of legal affairs and again has no link to the Welsh capital or Wales.
According to the Companies House register, Barros-Curtis was the sole director of Movement for Another Future Limited – which was the name linked to Starmer’s website during his successful campaign to become leader of the Labour Party.
Starmer also used the strapline “Another Future is Possible” throughout his campaign.
Prior to working on Starmer’s campaign, Barros-Curtis had a role in Owen Smith’s failed 2016 leadership bid, in which he was a “trusted adviser to Mr Smith and the campaign’s chair and vice-chair in the campaign’s final weeks”.
Saville-Roberts (below) said: "Labour’s last-minute parachuting of candidates proves that they’re forever taking Wales for granted.
"There are now several examples of local Labour voices being completely ignored by the UK leadership, snubbing Welsh councillors and activists.
"We know that Keir Starmer likes to have an iron grip on selection processes and that he objects to a plurality of views within his party, and it now appears that this extends to who he is willing to have as Labour candidates in Wales.
"Labour voters who will be feeling aggrieved can vote for Plaid Cymru candidates who will always put the interests of Wales ahead of personal interest."
Labour have also been accused of parachuting in candidates for Scotland in recent weeks.
Melanie Ward – brought in to replace Wilma Brown in Kirkcaldy and Cowdenbeath after she was removed for “racist” social media activity – lives in London.
READ MORE: Labour's plans for GB Energy branded a 'sham' after major admission
The party’s candidate in Angus and Perthshire Glens is Elizabeth Carr-Ellis, who is a councillor more than 500 miles away in the city of Canterbury, in Kent.
And Labour’s candidate in Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross is Eva Kestner, who works as a councillor in Lewisham in London.
Experts told the Sunday National earlier this month that Rishi Sunak’s sudden announcement of a General Election date on July 4 could lead to more incidents of candidates being parachuted into areas they know little about.
Professor Murray Leith, a politics lecturer at the University of the West of Scotland, said while it generally doesn’t have an impact in safe seats, it can be a risk in marginal constituencies.
He added the rush to have a candidate in place can also lead to a lack of due diligence during the selection process.
Professor Richard Finlay at Strathclyde University said there was a “general expectation” that a local candidate would have an advantage over someone who is parachuted in.
“It can also be seen as evidence of the strength of the local party, or lack of it if someone has to be brought in,” he said.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel