LABOUR are under fire after frontbenchers met with the architects of a “far-right manifesto” that proposes completely reshaping the US into an ultra-conservative state.
It comes after The Independent reported that Labour shadow immigration minister Stephen Kinnock and shadow exports minister Tan Dhesi flew to Washington DC to meet with the “extremist” Heritage Foundation.
Shadow foreign secretary David Lammy also asked to speak at the foundation during his trip to the US earlier in May but was turned down, reports said.
READ MORE: Mhairi Black taunts top Labour MP for admitting: 'I'm a small-c conservative'
The Heritage Foundation, one of the most influential think tanks on the American right, is the lead on the Project 2025 manifesto.
Backed by more than 100 other right-wing organisations, Project 2025 proposes a complete reshaping of the US government with an “army” of pre-trained loyalists and the dismissal of up to 50,000 federal employees.
Plans include dismantling the Department of Education, curbing the independence of the Department of Justice, swingeing deregulation of oil and gas industries, and abortion being made completely illegal.
The Associated Press reported that Project 2025 was a plan made by “Trump-era conservatives [who] want to gut the ‘administrative state’ from within”.
Kevin Roberts, the Heritage Foundation’s president, has said that Project 2025 “starts with deleting the terms sexual orientation and gender identity, diversity, equity, and inclusion, gender, gender equality, gender equity, gender awareness, gender-sensitive, abortion, reproductive health, reproductive rights, and any other term used to deprive Americans of their First Amendment rights out of every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation that exists”.
US congresswoman Ayanna Pressley sounded the alarm about Project 2025 on the same day Labour MPs were reported to have visited the Heritage Foundation.
She said: “For many people, this is their first time hearing about it, and we must sound the alarm.
“Project 2025 is a far-right manifesto. It is a one-thousand-page bucket list of extremist policies that would uproot every government agency and disrupt the lives of every person who calls this country home.”
The news of Labour’s meeting with the Heritage Foundation led to intense criticism from Scottish politicians.
READ MORE: Labour parachute 'extremist' Israel lobbyist Luke Akehurst into safe seat
SNP MSP James Dornan told The National: “I'd love to say I'm shocked at the prospect of Labour working closely with one of the most dangerous right-wing think tanks in the USA, but under Starmer it has been clear for some time that this is Labour's direction of travel.”
Dornan pointed to Starmer’s treatment of Labour MP hopefuls such as Diane Abbott, saying it “should be a warning to all that despite of the constant use of the word ‘change’, all we can expect under this likely incoming Labour government is more of the same destructive right-wing policies, but in a turbo-charged and authoritarian manner”.
And Maggie Chapman, the Scottish Greens’ equality spokesperson said: “The Heritage Foundation are a far-right extremist group. It is shocking but maybe not that surprising that members of Keir Starmer’s Labour Party would want to spend any time in their company.
“Over the last few weeks, the Labour Party has dropped progressive policies, expelled left-wing members and welcomed die-hard conservatives into their ranks. They have put big business profits before our planet's future, and are drawing up plans to sell off our NHS to the private sector.
READ MORE: Donald Trump attacks ‘rigged trial’ and criticises star witness
“For LGBT+ people and women across the country, the prospect of the Labour Party working with Trump’s extremist cronies will be a terrifying one.”
Former US president Donald Trump is widely expected to be officially named the Republican Party’s choice to run for the presidency in the coming weeks, despite having been found guilty on 34 counts in a hush money trial.
Project 2025 has not explicitly been adopted by the Trump campaign, but commentators say it is broadly aligned with his goals and values and appears to have been designed with him in mind.
The architects of the manifesto have said it could be adopted by any conservative president.
The Labour Party did not respond to The National’s request for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel