SCOTLAND wasn't mentioned once by either Rishi Sunak or Keir Starmer during their first televised debate.
The leaders of the Conservatives and the Labour Party went head-to-head on ITV on Tuesday night for the first of their televised electoral face-offs.
However, while they clashed over issues including tax, the NHS, immigration and the cost of living in a debate that at times seemed bad-tempered, neither leader seemed to deem voters in Scotland worthy of a mention.
Speaking on ITV after the debate, the SNP's leader at Westminster Stephen Flynn was asked whether Scottish voters fed up with Conservative rule should vote for the Labour Party.
READ MORE: Rishi Sunak and Keir Starmer in General Election debate
He said: “As all the opinion polls would indicate, Keir Starmer is going to be the next prime minister.
“Polls put the Labour majority well into the three figures, the people of Scotland have a choice to make, who do they think is going to best stand up for Scotland’s interests in Westminster?”
Asked if the SNP would “do a deal” with Labour in the case of a hung parliament, he said: “I think it’s pretty obvious what Scottish nationalists would demand.”
However, during a series of quickfire questions at the end of the interview Flynn was asked by presenter Anushka Asthana who he thought won the debate.
"I don't think the people of Scotland won because I don't think Scotland was mentioned once," he said.
Both Sunak and Starmer were reprimanded by debate host Julie Etchingham during the debate for talking over each other following opening skirmishes over the state of the public finances.
Starmer rejected as “absolute garbage” the claim that he would hike taxes by £2000 if he became prime minister while later in the debate Sunak made clear that he would be willing to leave the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) if the Government’s stalled Rwanda deportation plan remains blocked by the courts.
He said: “If I am forced to choose between securing our borders and our country’s security, or a foreign court, I’m going to choose our country’s security every single time.”
Starmer said the UK risked becoming a “pariah” state if it left international conventions.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel