A LETTER from a top civil servant in the Treasury has shown that claims made by Rishi Sunak in last night’s televised debate against Keir Starmer should not have been presented “as having been produced by the civil service”.
Last night, Sunak repeatedly claimed that Labour’s spending plans would result in a £2000 tax rise for people living in the UK.
At one point during the debate, he said: “Independent Treasury officials have costed Labour’s policies and they amount to a £2000 tax rise for every working family”.
However, a letter from permanent secretary in the Treasury, James Bowler, appears to entirely undermine Sunak’s claim and expose that the prime minister was lying about who produced the £2000 figure.
In a letter to shadow chief secretary of the Treasury Darren Jones, Bowler wrote:
READ MORE: Stephen Flynn says Scotland 'wasn't mentioned once' during ITV debate
"As you will expect, civil servants were not involved in the production or presentation of the Conservative Party’s document 'Labour’s Tax Rises' or in the calculation of the total figure used ... the £38bn figure used in the Conservative Party’s publication includes costs beyond those provided by the Civil Service.
"I agree that any costings derived from other sources or produced by other organisations should not be presented as having been produced by the Civil Service.
“I have reminded ministers and advisers that this should be the case.”
Labour candidate Jonathan Ashworth said the Tories had been “caught red-handed”.
During an appearance on LBC, he said: “It has just broken on Twitter, or X as it’s now called, that the permanent secretary of the Treasury wrote to Tory ministers telling them that they could not use these figures, so they have been caught red-handed lying to the British public.
Would be good if journalists could be crystal clear here.
— Jonathan Portes (@jdportes) June 5, 2024
Sunak was simply lying about this, as this official statement from @hmtreasury makes clear. pic.twitter.com/bGqEt5EAgM
“Every single policy that we put forward in this campaign will be fully costed and will explain where the money is coming from.”
Earlier he told BBC Radio 4 that Sunak was no better than Boris Johnson when it came to honesty.
He said: “Rishi Sunak was resorting to lying because he is desperate and what do desperate people do when in a corner? They lie.
“We saw it with Boris Johnson over parties in Downing Street in lockdown, and Rishi Sunak has exposed himself as no better and no different than Boris Johnson with his lies last night.”
Despite the letter showing that the Treasury did not put its name to the £2000 figure, Cabinet minister Claire Coutinho insisted the Prime Minister’s claim is correct.
READ MORE: ITV presenter asks Stephen Flynn if he will support England in Euros
The Energy Secretary told BBC Breakfast: “Firstly, these are official costings from the Treasury, based on policies that the Labour Party has set out in documents and that they’ve said will be in the manifesto.”
SNP candidate Pete Wishart said that Starmer should have been able to call out Sunak’s figure immediately.
He said on Twitter/X: “The thing is Starmer didn't have the guile or political nous to close it down immediately. He then gifted Sunak a number of political hits.
“Why we need strong SNP voices representing the people of Scotland at Westminster.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel