BOTH Labour and the Tories are signed up to implement “serious spending cuts”, the head of a leading economic think tank has warned.
Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), has blown apart both parties' economic claims – as he insisted austerity was guaranteed if neither party wanted to raise targets or take on more debt.
The SNP have seized on Johnson’s claim as proof both Labour and the Tories will take an axe to public budgets if either is in power after the General Election.
Responding to Tuesday’s ITV leaders debate between Rishi Sunak and Keir Starmer, Johnson said: “We don’t know what either party will do on tax over the next parliament.”
He pointed out that “both appear to be committed to one substantial tax rise” in the form of freezing personal tax allowances and thresholds for the next three years – a move worth £11 billion for the Exchequer.
And he said that Tory attacks claiming Labour’s tax policy would see significant rises were “not independently arrived at or verified”. Labour have called them “lies”.
Johnson (above) added: “Third and most importantly, it looks more likely than not that either party would need to raise taxes if they want to avoid serious spending cuts and meet the fiscal rules to which they have both signed up.”
In an article published yesterday, the IFS said it was the Government’s fiscal target – to which Labour is also signed up – that “puts a binding constraint on policy”.
READ MORE: Respected think tank says Labour and Tories 'avoiding spending cuts reality'
It requires that debt falls as a percentage of national income between four and five years out.
The think tank said while the “underlying” ambition for debt to come down was “a sensible one”, the target was “more arbitrary and gameable than most”.
And the IFS warned Labour was operating “just” within the limits of its self-imposed borrowing rules with its scaled-back green prosperity plan.
The report added that “it looks as though Labour’s new, pared-back investment plans are just about consistent with a promise to get debt falling” and warned: “It remains to be seen whether that will still be the case come the autumn.”
Drew Hendry (above), the SNP’s economy spokesperson, said: “The IFS are clear: the economic plan proposed by both Rishi Suank and Sir Keir Starmer will lead to cuts, cuts and more cuts to core public services – underlining why it's vital to vote SNP to protect our NHS and put Scotland's interests first.
“It's high time both Westminster parties stopped being dishonest about their plans and came clean with the public on where the axe will fall when it comes to public service cuts.
READ MORE: Rachel Reeves denies Anas Sarwar 'blew apart' her fiscal rules in debate
“We know that at least £18bn worth of cuts are coming down the line under the Tories and the Labour Party's spending plans, yet both Rishi Sunak and Sir Keir Starmer remain wedded to a conspiracy of silence about their joint austerity agenda.”
Scottish Tory finance spokesperson Liz Smith (below) hit back, accusing the SNP of having “some nerve given the state of our public services following their gross mismanagement of Scotland’s economy”.
She added: “The nationalists have made Scotland the highest taxed part of the UK, and while Scots are paying more, they are undoubtedly getting less as our NHS waiting times skyrocket and our education sector remains in crisis.
“Rather than trying to pass the buck, the SNP must accept they have never protected our public services.”
Labour have been approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel