FIRST Minister of Scotland John Swinney has urged Labour to explain where £18 billion in cuts predicted by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) will come from.
In a letter to Keir Starmer, Swinney urged the Labour leader to “be open with voters and admit where the axe will fall under the Labour Party’s plan for £18 billion cuts to public services”.
Deputy Labour leader Angela Rayner failed to answer the same question during the BBC leaders’ debate on Friday.
The IFS said there is a “conspiracy of silence” between Labour and the Tories over details and warned of around £18bn of “sharp cuts”.
READ MORE: Labour criticised for 'U-turning' on plans to abolish House of Lords
In the letter, Swinney said £18bn of cuts would be a “wrecking ball to public services”.
The letter read: “It is the equivalent of cutting 130,000 nurses, 150,000 teachers and 160,000 police officers.”
SNP leader Swinney described Labour’s intentions as “planning to take the axe to public services as a result of being wedded to Tory fiscal rules and a growth-destroying Brexit”.
He added: “That is vital money taken away from Scotland’s public services – meaning less money available for the NHS and schools, less money to tackle poverty, and less money to help families with the cost of living.
“Voters have a right to know where the axe would fall under the Labour Party’s plans to impose another decade of cuts.”
It branded the proposed cuts “devastating for Scotland and services across the UK”.
The letter added: “These Westminster cuts will be made even worse because the Labour Party also wants to continue imposing a hard Brexit, which has removed Scotland from the world’s largest single market, wiped £40 billion of tax receipts from the UK economy and which the OBR (Office for Budget Responsibility) estimates will inflict a 4% hit to GDP.
“You have already admitted that the Labour Party won’t reverse Tory welfare cuts, which are pushing thousands of Scottish children into poverty.
“You have also made clear that the NHS will not get the meaningful funding boost it needs under a UK Labour Party government – but you have repeatedly refused to say which public services will be hit under your £18 billion cuts.”
Shadow Secretary of State for Scotland Ian Murray said: “John Swinney has a brass neck peddling this mince. Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves have been clear – there will be no return to austerity under Labour.
READ MORE: Rishi Sunak's D-Day move 'completely destroyed' his credibility, says John Swinney
“Meanwhile John Swinney was the architect of austerity who inflicted years of cuts to council budgets, leaving local services on their knees. He thinks a nurse on £29,000 a year should pay more tax but oil and gas giants taking in billions of pounds in profits shouldn’t. It doesn’t add up.
“Labour will prioritise economic stability to keep interest rates down and protect household finances while ending exploitative zero-hours contracts and making work pay with a pay rise for 200,000 Scots.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel