SCOTTISH Tory leader Douglas Ross has denied he believes Westminster is more important than Holyrood during a clash with a BBC presenter.
The Highlands and Islands MSP announced his intention to stand down as his party’s leader and denied claims his colleagues had forced him to do so.
Speaking to the BBC’s Good Morning Scotland programme, Ross was grilled by host Laura Maxwell on his “job insurance” scheme in which he will only stand down as an MSP should he not win the Aberdeenshire North and Moray East seat in the upcoming General Election.
READ MORE: Douglas Ross is now resigned to unresigning as leader of the Tories
The host put it to Ross that he believed Westminster was more important than Holyrood and asked why he wouldn’t stand down as an MSP right now.
“Well I’m absolutely not saying that Laura, that may be your impression, that is not my impression,” he said.
“The two parliaments deal with very different things.”
Maxwell said that Ross would presumably stay on at Holyrood were he not to win a seat at the upcoming election and said he had created a “little job insurance scheme”.
Ross replied: “No it’s not, it’s because I’ve been in representative politics since 2007. I’ve always sought to represent the constituents who look for that form of representation to raise the issues in either the UK Parliament or the Scottish Parliament.
“And as I say I will be continuing to do that throughout my time as an elected representative, bringing forward cases where people are struggling, where they need help and support and raising issues in parliament for the concerns that people have both locally and nationally.”
READ MORE: Tory candidate set to replace Douglas Ross as MSP lives in London
Asked if he could realistically stay in Holyrood if he was only there because he did not win a seat at Westminster, Ross said: "The backbenches at Holyrood have a number of former leaders on them."
He added that some of those former leaders “make more contribution than others”.
Asked directly if his Holyrood colleagues has asked him to stand down, Ross said this was not the case.
He also refused to say who he would back to replace him as the party’s leader.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel