DOUGLAS Ross has refused to say he would withdraw from the election contest if found guilty of breaking MP expenses rules.
Concerns have been raised by the Scottish Tory leader’s advisers over 28 parliamentary travel claims which may have been combined with his work as a linesman.
It came after Ross controversially replaced David Duguid as candidate for Aberdeenshire North and Moray East.
Ross has since said he will step down as leader of his party after the election and quit as an MSP if he is elected to Westminster.
But when questioned over whether he would back out of the contest if he was found to have breached expenses policy by the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (Ipsa), he refused to clarify his intentions.
READ MORE: Open 'swift' probe into Douglas Ross expenses, SNP urge watchdogs
However, he insisted he had gone through all 28 claims and doubled checked they were all legitimate.
Asked if he would step back from the campaign if found guilty, he told reporters in Edinburgh: “They [Ipsa] are an independent body, I am going to wait to hear from them and answer any questions if they have any questions but I’m very comfortable the claims I have made have been in line with my duties as a member of Parliament.”
Ipsa has said it is reviewing the complaints but no investigation has yet been launched.
Under UK parliamentary rules, MPs can only claim travel from their home airport.
Ross denied that a £48.99 parking fee he claimed for on the day he refereed a Celtic game in November 2020 was linked to anything other than his duties as an MP.
There are also questions over a £58 parking fee he claimed for at Inverness Airport when Parliament was in recess in July 2018.
He went on: “Sometimes I travel from Inverness, sometimes I travel from Aberdeen, but they are always in line with getting to and from the House of Commons.
“All I can say is I have claimed expenses in my role as an MP in getting to and from Westminster. How I get to and from Westminster changes. IPSA can and will I’m sure scrutinise this in the normal way.”
Ross also dodged the question when he was asked by The National if he would step down as an MSP now rather than after the election if he gets his seat in order to give constituents his full attention during the campaign.
Asked whether he felt it was better to step down from Holyrood now and put his full effort into his campaign, he said: “I’m standing as the candidate for Aberdeenshire North and Moray East and I’m urging people and hoping people will unite behind me to beat the SNP, end their obsession with independence, and get the focus onto the issues that really matter and the people of Aberdeenshire North and Moray East know if they vote for me as their MP that I will step down from my other roles and focus on the issues that matter.
READ MORE: Douglas Ross in clash with BBC presenter over leaving Holyrood
“My full energy is in the campaign for Aberdeenshire North and Moray East and across the rest of the country, I’ve made that very clear.”
Ross added the last few days had been “very challenging” for his party and were “not good enough”.
Duguid was told by the party’s management board he could not stand due to ill health, with Ross stepping in at the last minute.
He said: “It’s been a very challenging few days and I’m not trying to ignore that or run away from that.”
Ross confirmed he had been in contact with Duguid by text but when he offered to speak to him in person, Duguid had said he would “prefer to text as we did”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel