AN independent Scotland would focus on raising revenue rather than resorting to austerity, the First Minister has said.
John Swinney has repeatedly castigated Labour and the Conservatives during the election campaign, claiming both parties are refusing to level with the public that £18 billion worth of spending cuts are required.
The figure was drawn up by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS).
Ahead of the 2021 Holyrood election, IFS director David Phillips said an independent Scotland would need to “cut its cloth to fit the size of its own purse”.
But speaking on the BBC’s Panorama programme – which is interviewing each of the UK’s political leaders ahead of the General Election on July 4 – the First Minister rejected the idea that austerity could be required.
READ MORE: John Swinney rows back on SNP's 'independence negotiations' pledge in BBC interview
“No, I don’t accept that,” he said.
“I think anyone that looks at my track record, I was 10 years the finance minister of Scotland, and I ran a balanced budget.
“I knew how to control money, I knew how to raise revenue, I knew how to make sure we lived within our means.
“So, I accept that an independent Scotland would have to exercise financial stability and fiscal sustainability.
“All of those considerations have to be part of the discussion about independence, but it’s an obligation of government to make sure that’s done properly.
“Of course, part of what we’re wrestling with today is the fact that the United Kingdom government of Liz Truss spectacularly didn’t do that and caused the type of increase in mortgages that people are wrestling with in Scotland today.
READ MORE: Scots back independence and Tories face total wipeout, new poll finds
“What the Institute for Fiscal Studies is saying in their analysis of Scotland’s finances, they look at Scotland’s finances within the United Kingdom, but they also accept, and I think it’s important to accept this, that as an independent country, we would have much more flexibility and manoeuvrability as a country to improve our economic performance.”
The First Minister claimed GDP per head had risen faster in Scotland than the rest of the UK since 2007, while the productivity gap has “substantially, if not entirely” closed.
He added: “What [being] an independent country allows us to do, and if you look at other small, European, independent countries, they’ve got stronger economic performance than the UK, and Scotland would be in a position to emulate that.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel