KEIR Starmer is set to announce major spending cuts if Labour gain power at the General Election after repeatedly ruling out major tax rises.
According to the i newspaper Labour will announce there will be no further spending promises in their party manifesto, which is due to be revealed later on Thursday.
Party insiders have reportedly admitted Labour will be forced into “really difficult” decisions around public services when it comes to the Budget.
While Labour will not address specifically where the cuts could fall, it is believed services such as local government, police, and immigration officials are most at risk.
READ MORE: Labour manifesto should rule out ‘creeping privatisation of NHS', says John Swinney
When asked earlier this week whether he was willing to revisit the party’s spending plans, Starmer said: “It is always tempting for a government to go for tax and spend – but I’m not going to pull those levers, we don’t intend to pull those levers, we want to go for the lever marked growth.”
However, according to economists Labour would face “pretty unappealing” choices for signing up to the Tory Government’s existing spending plans.
It is also believed that the party will have to increase taxes on savers and businesses to fit the bill to improve services in the short term.
A senior Labour insider told the i newspaper that a sustainable boost to public services could take more than a single term of government to be put into place.
They said: “It will be really difficult. “But there will be an immediate injection of funding which will help, and then we are going to grow the economy.
“That is the only way. That’s why we need a decade of national renewal.”
Labour sources also told the paper that the party was not able to identify any specific cuts without carrying out a comprehensive spending review once in office.
Shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves has already promised not to increase income tax, national insurance or VAT during the next parliament.
Carl Emmerson, deputy director of the IFS, said: “Unless they get lucky on growth, they would either have to do more on tax rises that they haven’t told us about, or they would have to deliver cuts to the public services that have already been hit by the austerity of the 2010s.
“I don’t think it’s plausible to deliver those cuts and not see a deterioration of quality in those services.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel