Health Secretary Neil Gray has criticised SNP colleague John Mason for voting against legislation to set up safe access zones around abortion clinics in Scotland.
Backbencher Mason was the only MSP to vote against a bill brought forward by Scottish Green Gillian Mackay which will create 200-metre zones around health facilities where anti-abortion protesters will be banned from gathering.
Gray said he disagreed with Mason's stance in voting against the Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Scotland) Bill at Holyrood earlier this week.
The Health Secretary said he was "incredibly proud" the legislation had been passed, adding it will make a "discernible difference to people's lives".
He added: "I disagreed with what John Mason did this week, I don't think that was right."
He said Mason has "long held views" on the matter, which are "based on his personal religious conviction".
With the Scottish Government having supported the legislation, Gray said it will be for others in the SNP to decide if Mason should be sanctioned for voting against the bill.
Speaking to the PA news agency, he added: "That is not a decision for me."
The Health Secretary continued: "I can understand, given his longstanding and very public position on these matters, why he has taken that decision.
"If there is a disciplinary process will be a matter for other people to determine."
READ MORE: Gillian Mackay: The buffer zones bill has been an emotional journey
Gray said he is "very pleased" the legislation - which will lead to buffer zones being established at 30 sites across Scotland - had been passed by the Scottish Parliament.
He also paid tribute to the "leadership" shown by campaign group Back Off Scotland on the issue, saying women in the group had "gone above and beyond" to highlight the experiences of women and staff at clinics who have had to walk past protesters.
Gray said while Mackay had taken the issue forward as a member's bill at Holyrood, support from the Government and other parties showed the "parliament working at its best" when MSPs are able to find a common cause.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel