A BBC podcast featuring Laura Kuenssberg has been criticised for its discussion of Nigel Farage and the Reform party.
Speaking on the latest BBC Newscast episode, Laura Kuenssberg and Chris Mason were discussing the possibility of Reform becoming the largest opposition party after the election.
It comes after a YouGov poll commissioned by The Times this week had Reform at 19% and the Conservatives at 18% in voting intention.
Why do #BBC journalists waste their & our time asking nonsensical questions? Reform cannot in any realistic scenario become the official opposition; the Lib Dems could. But that is less sensationalist. And does not involve talking up Farage. https://t.co/ckTGMYdIMH
— Gerry Hassan 🇺🇦 (@GerryHassan) June 14, 2024
While discussing Reform on the podcast, Kuenssberg said: “It’s almost unimaginable that the Reform party would be the biggest party in opposition, which means the party with the second-biggest number of MPs sitting in the Commons, that would be something astonishing, seismic, any other adjective you want to use and nobody in Reform thinks that they are heading for more than a sort of sprinkling of seats as things stand.
“However, they do think that they can get millions of votes, maybe as many as six million votes.”
Mason then added that under the Westminster system, “it’s not much use having lots of people in lots of places who like you”.
READ MORE: Roz Foyer: Media must step up to the plate amid rise of far right
“You need lots of people in geographically concentrated spots.”
However, some critics took to Twitter/X to criticise the discussion with political commentator
Gerry Hassan writing: “Why do #BBC journalists waste their & our time asking nonsensical questions?
“Reform cannot in any realistic scenario become the official opposition; the LibDems could. But that is less sensationalist.
“And does not involve taking up Farage.”
Many others also took to the comments section to express their frustration with one person saying, “this is simply not going to happen”.
“You’re entering into the realms of fantasy here,” said a second while a third user questioned why this had even been put up for discussion.
The comments come after Stephen Flynn recently criticised the UK media for its “wall-to-wall” coverage of Farage’s run for a seat in Westminster.
READ MORE: Mhairi Black: Passing of buffer zones bill is something to be proud of
He argued it risk letting right-wing voices dominate the narrative.
Prior to announcing his run as an MP, Farage appeared on a Question Time for what was believed to be the 37th time at the end of May.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel