Winner in 2019 of predecessor seat of East Kilbride, Strathaven and Lesmahagow – Lisa Cameron (elected as SNP, switched to Conservatives in 2023)
THE Conservative Member of Parliament for East Kilbride” sounds like the punchline to a joke but it’s been a very real phenomenon over the last few months due to Lisa Cameron’s extraordinary decision to defect from the SNP to the Tories in October last year.
It had been widely known that she was unhappy with what she regarded as her SNP colleagues’ intolerance towards her views on social issues such as abortion, and she was in line to be deselected as the local SNP candidate anyway.
So it wouldn’t have been a massive shock if Cameron had resigned the whip to sit as an independent MP, or even if she had defected to a smaller pro-independence party.
READ MORE: Clackmannanshire town a strange addition where SNP face a fight
But by taking the more extreme step of joining the one party that is completely anathema to the type of constituency she represents for well-known historical reasons, she destroyed the theoretical chance of using any personal following she had built up to try to defend her seat under a new banner.
The Tories won’t even be fielding Cameron as their candidate in the redrawn constituency of East Kilbride and Strathaven, which means it’s entirely possible that the defection will end up having more or less zero effect on their local electoral fortunes.
On the notional results last time they took 22% of the vote and that will probably go down sharply in line with national trends. But the more interesting question is whether the defection will have some impact on the battle between the SNP and Labour for the seat.
Labour have punted the line that people “voted SNP and got Tory”, which is cheeky of them, given that Labour MPs themselves haven’t been immune to switching party in the past. It also shouldn’t really ring true as a reason not to vote SNP this time, because the new SNP candidate Grant Costello couldn’t be more different from his predecessor and presents no plausible risk whatsoever of defecting to the Conservatives in the future.
But it’s an unfortunate truth that some voters are “low information” and are thus vulnerable to simplistic and misleading messaging.
It can’t be ruled out that there will be a drag on the SNP’s local support due to the Cameron episode, which would be the last thing they need because the odds are probably slightly against them in East Kilbride and Strathaven.
READ MORE: SNP can be quietly confident in new Yes City constituency
On the notional 2019 results, their lead over Labour in the constituency was just under 25 percentage points, very close to the Scotland-wide gap between the two parties. So if Labour have any sort of national lead over the SNP at all on July 4, they would likely gain the seat on a uniform swing.
But if the SNP are looking around for signs of optimism, one thing that leaps out is that 66% of the constituency’s voters are believed to have backed Remain in the 2016 EU referendum, four points higher than the Scotland-wide figure.
That ought to pose a significant problem for the Labour Party following Angela Rayner’s clear statement in the recent ITV debate that Labour would never take Britain back into the EU, and Stephen Flynn’s (above) equally clear statement that the SNP do want to take Scotland back in.
But it’s doubtful that the SNP have really made Brexit a prominent enough issue in the campaign, so far at least, for it to be the decisive factor in a seat like East Kilbride and Strathaven.
This is a race that may go down to the wire, and the SNP will perhaps only be truly confident of holding the seat if they can re-establish a decent national cushion over Labour prior to polling day.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel