THE number of children affected by the two-child benefit cap will rise by a third over the next five years, the Institute for Fiscal Studies has warned.
The limit currently affects two million children, with more hit each year because it applies to those born after April 5 2017.
Next year, 250,000 more children will be affected, rising to 670,000 before the end of the next parliament if the policy is not reformed, according to the think tank.
Neither Labour nor the Conservatives have in their General Election manifestos vowed to scrap the Tory policy long-blamed for keeping children in poverty.
The cap, described as “cruel” by campaigners, was introduced in 2017 and restricts Child Tax Credit and Universal Credit to the first two children in most households.
READ MORE: Reform candidate resigns after 'vote BNP' comments unearthed
When fully rolled out, it will affect one in five children, rising to 38% of those in the poorest fifth of households, the IFS research found.
It said that 43% of children in households with at least one person of Bangladeshi or Pakistani origin will be affected.
Affected households on average will lose £4300 per year, representing 10% of their income, according to the analysis.
The introduction of the cap has helped drive up the share of children in large families who are in relative poverty from 35% in 2014-15 to 46% in 2022–23, a period when poverty for families with one or two children fell, the IFS said.
The research institute said removing the cost of the limit would cost the Government about £3.4 billion a year, roughly the same as freezing fuel duties for the next parliament.
IFS research economist Eduin Latimer said: “The two-child limit is one of the most significant welfare cuts since 2010 and, unlike many of those cuts, it becomes more important each year as it is rolled out to more families.”
Mubin Haq, chief executive of the abrdn Financial Fairness Trust, which funded the research, said: “The limit has been a significant contributor to child poverty amongst large families during a period when poverty for families with one or two children fell.
“If the next government is serious about tackling child poverty, it will need to review the two-child limit.
“There is an inherent unfairness in the policy as it affects only those children born after April 5 2017.
“The majority of families affected are in work or have caring responsibilities for disabled relatives or young children.”
READ MORE: Tony Blair blasted for latest verdict on Scottish independence
Child Poverty Action Group chief executive Alison Garnham said: “Child poverty in the UK is a national disgrace and the biggest driver of it is the two-child limit. It makes life worse for kids up and down the country and limits their future chances.
“Children affected by child poverty don’t have a voice in this election but politicians from all parties have a responsibility to them to show leadership. Any government serious about making things better for the next generation will have to scrap the two-child limit, and do so quickly.”
Paul Carberry, chief executive at Action for Children, said: “Here is yet more shocking evidence of the huge scale of the damage being caused to children and families by the cruel two-child limit, which is well known to push families into poverty and, which if scrapped, would lift 300,000 children out of hardship.
“The election presents an opportunity for bold and ambitious action to be taken and for all political parties to commit to ending child poverty once and for all. That must include an increase to the child element of Universal Credit and scrapping the two-child limit and benefit cap.”
SNP social justice spokesman David Linden pointed the finger at Labour, claiming the party would “push thousands of Scottish children into poverty”.
“It’s utterly disgraceful – and it shows why it’s vital to vote SNP to reject Starmer’s cuts, tackle child poverty and put Scotland’s interests first,” he added.
“The SNP has put eradicating child poverty at the heart of our election campaign. We’ve lifted 100,000 children out of poverty with progressive policies like the Scottish Child Payment and Best Start Grant – and we’re demanding action at Westminster, including an emergency budget to scrap the two-child cap, raise universal credit, and abolish the bedroom tax.
“It’s shameful the Labour Party is wedded to welfare cuts and Brexit policies that will make child poverty and the cost of living even worse.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here