IT is “critical” that a UK Labour government sticks to a manifesto pledge to hand control over post-Brexit structural funding to devolved governments, Patrick Harvie has said after Scottish Labour’s leader appeared to walk back on the promise.
Harvie, the co-leader of the Scottish Greens, told The National that Labour also needed to restore the scale of the EU funds lost to Brexit.
Before Brexit, the EU had given structural funding to the devolved government in Scotland to allocate as they chose – often within ring-fenced areas.
However, the Tory-run UK Government decided it would have sole control over replacement “levelling up” pots such as the Shared Prosperity Fund, sparking claims of rolling back the devolution settlement.
The Labour Party’s General Election manifesto, which was published on Thursday, pledges to “restore decision-making over the allocation of structural funds to the representatives of Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland”.
However, on Friday Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar said he expected the allocation of the funds would be a “partnership”, with the UK Government having some level of control.
Speaking to The National on Monday, Scottish Greens MSP Harvie said: “Brexit was imposed on Scotland against our will. It did a huge amount of harm to our society, to our economy. One example of that was the loss of the structural funds. A huge amount of money invested in Scotland, and under the direct control of the Scottish Government.
“The Tories, they promised that they would replace it, but what they replaced it with was on a fraction of the scale and with a fraction of the degree of control for Scotland.
🗣️'It will simply be yet another signal that they are a Brexit party every bit as much as the Tories'
— The National (@ScotNational) June 17, 2024
Scottish Green co-leader Patrick Harvie calls on Labour to stick to their manifesto pledge to devolve powers of structural funds to Holyrood ⬇️ pic.twitter.com/Amztkrj1OD
“It's really critical that we put immediate pressure on the incoming UK Labour government to reverse that. They need to restore the structural funds to the scale that they were and give the degree of control that Scotland had.
“If they refuse to do that, if they don't do what it says in their manifesto – which they've opened big question marks on in the last few days – then it will simply be yet another signal that they are a Brexit party every bit as much as the Tories.”
The calls come as Labour also faces pressure to commit to ending the Tories’ two-child cap on benefits.
READ MORE: Huge poll predicts every seat in Scotland in General Election
On Monday, the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) warned that its analysis had concluded that 250,000 more children would be impacted by the policy in 2025, rising to 670,000 more by the end of the next UK parliament.
Asked about the IFS analysis, Harvie said: “It does seem extraordinary that Labour, who are looking to be on course for a thumping great majority across the UK, are still so timid that they won't even say that they'll scrap the two-child limit.
“They should be taking a leaf out of Scotland's book. Scotland, having created the Scottish Child Payment, is being recognised across Europe as having done one of the most impactful things to reduce child poverty.
“But the benefits of that are being wiped out by UK-level changes that are pushing children and families back into poverty.
“If Labour are at all serious about making an opportunity out of the thumping great majority they're about to be given, they need to be radical, they need to be bold, and they need to be willing to say we're not going to stick to Tory spending limits.
“We're going to be investing in the communities that need it and in the action that will be necessary to eliminate child poverty.”
Labour have been asked for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel