RISHI Sunak faced shouts of “shame” when he said he would prioritise the UK’s security over the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
As the Prime Minister took part in a BBC Question Time election special, audience members pressed him about the UK’s commitment to the international agreement.
The convention is enshrined in UK law, with references to human rights law used in recent immigration cases to successfully halt deportation attempts.
READ MORE: Are the Tories running the worst General Election campaign of all time?
Asked whether he was prepared to leave the convention in order to meet his migration promises, the Prime Minister said: “I believe everything we are doing is compliant with our international obligations.”
Sunak said he was “prepared to do what it takes” to begin sending asylum seekers to Rwanda, adding that the country does not need a “foreign court” to issue instructions on border security.
“I will put our country first,” he added.
Petulant, patronising, passive aggression from Sunak, telling the audience (as he’s told the country) what he thinks they want, to fit his culture war.
— Supertanskiii (@supertanskiii) June 20, 2024
An angry crowd shouts “shame” and continues after the credits roll.
Unbelievable.
He’s losing his seat.#bbcqt pic.twitter.com/BaAmWpsSjj
“Shame,” audience members could be heard shouting following his answer (above).
One man suggested Russia and Belarus are the “only two countries” which are not signatories to the deal, a point which is not strictly true.
The two nations are, in fact, the only European states which are not party to it, with Russia having been expelled since the invasion of Ukraine.
Calls of “shame on you” could still be heard during the programme’s closing credits, though they appeared muffled.
Former Greens leader Caroline Lucas said: "Whoever trained Sunak for this #bbcqt session should be sacked - he’s totally lost it. So aggressive. So rude. This audience shouting “shame” gives me hope."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel