KEIR Starmer has bluntly refused to participate in negotiations for another Scottish independence referendum.
During a visit to West Lothian, the Labour leader said he would not participate in any talks if the SNP wins a majority of Scottish seats - something the SNP have agreed would give them a mandate to give "democratic effect" to independence.
Earlier this week the First Minister urged Scots to vote for his party to put pressure on the next UK Government to allow another independence referendum.
Speaking to Bauer Media during his visit, Starmer was asked if he would deal with the Scottish Government if the threshold was met.
“No,” he said.
Referring to the difference in electing Labour MPs compared to SNP MPs, he added: “Send a government – don’t send a message.”
Keir Starmer says there’ll be no negotiations with the Scottish Government on independence - even if a majority of SNP MPs are elected on July 4th
— Alan Smith (@Political_AlanS) June 21, 2024
The @UKLabour leader joined @AnasSarwar on a tour of a window factory in West Lothian earlier pic.twitter.com/QXDdqA7dRN
During his visit to a window factory in Whitburn, Starmer also said a Labour government would not lift the block on the Scottish Government’s gender reform laws.
READ MORE: Jeremy Corbyn: I was asked to 'automatically support' Israel action
Under the leadership of Nicola Sturgeon, the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill was passed in Holyrood, but a Section 35 order was later issued by Scottish Secretary Alister Jack to stop the legislation receiving royal assent.
“No, there would be no change of position on that,” Starmer aid.
“I think there’s a lot to learn about gender self-ID from the way in which it’s been dealt with here Scotland, which is why we’ve got a different proposition in our manifesto.”
Starmer also insisted John Swinney had “got his priorities wrong”.
He added his priority was to ensure a “strong economy” and create jobs.
“The ambition between the SNP and Labour is stark," claimed Starmer.
“We say elect Labour MPs in Scotland so they can sit at the heart of an incoming Labour government, bringing about the change that I think so many people in Scotland want.
“What the SNP says is send an MP to send a message, to sit literally on the opposition benches and shout across the aisle.”
SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn said it was “telling” that Starmer has “already adopted the same old Westminster arrogance when it comes to respecting Scottish democracy”.
“The right to self-determination doesn’t end because Sir Keir Starmer says so – the people of Scotland have the democratic right to choose our own future,” he added.
“It’s not asking a lot to expect anyone who calls themselves a democrat to respect that right too.
“Clearly Anas Sarwar’s recent statement that ‘it is for the Scottish people to decide’ amounts to empty words, and it proves how little influence he really has over his London boss, and just how little Starmer thinks of Scottish voters."
Sarwar said during a TV debate it is "for Scottish people to decide what the future of our country is” yet refused to be drawn on whether he would support Scotland having the powers to hold a second referendum.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel