TO Whitburn, West Lothian, past the grown-over bings of Lanarkshire, there to meet Anas Sarwar and Keir Starmer on the election campaign trail at a windows factory.
After a train, another train, and a slightly ghostly coach on which I was the only passenger for around 15 minutes and allowed to ride for free – no reason was given – I found my way to a small industrial estate on the western edge of the town.
Up the stairs to a meeting room, where hot drinks, Tunnock's tea cakes and shortbread had been laid on.
Hacks were instructed to arrive at 10.30am for an 11am start. We did not get to speak with the Scottish Labour leader and his boss until nearly 1pm.
We were told Starmer (above) had been held up in traffic coming from Edinburgh by the Royal Highland Show.
Once they finally arrived, the duo were given the complete tour, then spoke with broadcasters before deigning to speak with the plebeian Scottish press pack.
READ MORE: Audience laughs at Keir Starmer as Labour leader repeatedly ducks question
Assembled on the factory floor – noisy machines are always a good way to make journalists trying to listen to answers just that little bit harder – we tore in.
Starmer dodged a question I put to him about being a “serial liar” after his flip-flopping on his leadership pledges and his past support (or was it opposition?) for his predecessor Jeremy Corbyn (below).
He ducked the question, waffling on about his “changed” Labour Party which gave Sarwar the chance to quip that so changed was the Labour Party, The National had been given the first question in a press huddle.
So far, so Starmer, as we worked through a host of questions he wouldn’t really answer.
READ MORE: Keir Starmer gives blunt 'no' to independence talks if SNP win majority
But we did find out he would keep Westminster’s veto over Scottish transgender law reforms and that he would not enter negotiations on a second referendum, though the press pack got a more evasive answer than that given to the broadcasters.
Then Sarwar (above) was challenged on whether he would stand up to Starmer if the UK government under his stewardship did impose austerity on Scotland. Sarwar insisted there would be no return to austerity under Labour.
READ MORE: Fiona Bruce slated for 'blatant attempt' to shut down John Swinney on Brexit
Tellingly, Starmer jumped in. In a decidedly convoluted and artless answer, Starmer said: “In relation to our relationship, it’s a very strong working relationship.
“We consult and talk to each other all the time. We’re on a joint project here in terms of the change that we want to bring about for the Labour Party, in Anas’s case it’s Scottish Labour, in my case the wider Labour Party, and absolutely aligned on what we want to achieve which is that wealth creation, the jobs of the future, the energy sector, rushing towards the next generation of jobs with GB Energy.
“We think alike, we work together, we’ve got a huge amount of respect for one another and I think and I hope that you can see that on display every time that we are here together in Scotland.”
Not doing a lot for the branch office allegations.
You can get the Worst of Westminster delivered straight to your email inbox for FREE every Friday at 6pm by clicking here.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel