THERE are calls for an investigation to be held into the source of a £50,000 donation accepted by the Conservative Party from a firm with links to Michelle Mone’s husband.
Mone and her husband Doug Barrowman are currently under investigation by the National Crime Agency (NCA) in connection with the awarding of government PPE contracts worth more than £200 million to Barrowman’s company PPE Medpro.
The contracts were awarded in June 2020 however some of the PPE provided was deemed unusable by the NHS, leading the Department of Health and Social Care to sue the company for compensation.
The couple deny any wrongdoing.
Now, it has emerged that the Conservative Party accepted a £50,000 donation from Pulse Accounting – a firm controlled by a close business associate of Barrowman’s – in October 2020.
An investigation by The Times found that at the time of the donation Pulse Accounting was owned by Daniel Clay, who also owned a stake in an accounting firm alongside Barrowman.
READ MORE: Mishal Husain clashes with senior Tory during Radio 4 interview
Records show that Clay bought Pulse Accounting from a businessman in July 2019.
However, the investigation found that an offshore company called Perree (PTC) Limited, which has links to Barrowman and is registered in the British Virgin Islands, bought the company years before Clay purchased it.
Perree (PTC) is also listed as the trustee on a £20 million property once occupied by Mone and Barrowman and also loaned money to PPE Medpro.
Election law speculates that donations must come from companies on the UK electoral roll which carry out their business in the UK.
However, Barrowman is a resident of the Isle of Man and therefore cannot make donations in his own name.
Indeed, a £2400 donation offered by Barrowman was once rejected on these grounds.
As such, he has previously used UK companies to make donations.
But despite donating £50,000 in October 2020, Pulse Accounting’s accounts show that it had assets of just £49,000 at the end of that year.
“The donation is very large for a company like this with no substantial assets or turnover, and one with no history of political donations,” said Gavin Millar KC.
“There are grounds to investigate whether this was really the money of Mr Barrowman or one of his offshore companies.
“Not least of all the fact that a lucrative government contract had just been handed to his PPE Medpro company.
“A UK company can be a permissible donor to a political party if it carries on business here.
“But even if this requirement is met it must give its own money, not the money of a hidden, impermissible donor.”
A Conservative Party spokesperson said: “All reportable donations are properly and transparently declared to the Electoral Commission, published by them, and comply fully with the law.
“Fundraising is a legitimate part of the democratic process. The alternative is taxpayer-funding of political campaigning, which would mean less money for frontline services like schools and hospitals.”
Earlier this month a 46-year-old was arrested as part of the NCA's investigation into PPE Medpro.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel