RISHI Sunak has given his verdict on whether or not Scotland should have had a penalty during last night’s crucial Euros match against Hungary.
Steve Clarke’s side exited the competition as they suffered a 1-0 loss after a 100th minute winner from Kevin Csoboth.
However, the manager and pundits have been left furious at the decision not to award Scotland a penalty after Stuart Armstrong went down in the box under challenge from Willie Orban.
Were Scotland denied a penalty against Hungary?
— STV News (@STVNews) June 24, 2024
Catch key UEFA Euro 2024 matches on STV and STV Playerhttps://t.co/xdjkpIbUek pic.twitter.com/wvS2J6f9pK
Speaking at the manifesto launch for the Scottish Conservatives, both Douglas Ross and Rishi Sunak were keen to stress their anger at the decision.
Ross stepped up first and said: “I’ll start with the big news of the day, it was a penalty” before Sunak added that he “completely agreed” with his colleague.
A VAR check did not result in a pitchside review of the incident despite replays showing a connection between the two players.
READ MORE: Scotland vs Hungary: Tartan Army applauded out of stadium after match
Speaking to BBC Scotland after the match, Clarke said: "The moment in the game is the penalty. It is 100% a penalty.
"Somebody has to explain to me why that is not a penalty because otherwise, I'm thinking there is something wrong."
Asked whether he had held any conversation with the referee over the denied penalty appeal, he added: "What is the point? He is from Argentina. What is the point? Why is it not a European referee?
"I don't understand why he is here and not in his own country refereeing the game.
"I don't understand the VAR can look at that and say it is not a penalty, just my opinion."
Reacting to elimination from the tournament, Clarke said: "A tough night for us, tough night. We couldn't do what we wanted to do.
"We all suffer together, we are sad together. We are as sad as the supporters are because at the end of the day we are all supporters, we want to do well for our country.
"Unfortunately, it wasn't our night."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel