A WOMAN has been fined after she admitted making thousands of pounds from selling elephant ivory on eBay.
Joyce Bell, 67, sold about 100 items made with ivory from elephant tusks on the online auction site over a number of years, making a total of £6412.
When she was arrested in December 2022, she initially claimed the items were costume jewellery and other goods made from bovine bone, and that she had not been selling them for profit.
However, in May 2024, she pleaded guilty to the sale of ivory in 2022 in breach of the Ivory Act, which came into force the same year.
This is understood to be the first conviction in Scotland under the Ivory Act, which brought in a near-total ban on the import, export and dealing of items containing elephant ivory.
She also admitted fraudulently evading export duties by failing to obtain export licences for goods being shipped overseas.
At Dundee Sheriff Court on Monday, Sheriff George Way acknowledged it was Bell’s first offence, and that she seemed to be “genuinely remorseful” for her actions.
He also said she “didn’t quite realise the implications of the trade in ivory. It has many other ramifications but that might not always be obvious when dealing in bits and pieces”.
He added: “At the end of the day, the trade in these items is generated by money. If they weren’t valuable to some people, then, there wouldn’t be the illegal trade, and there wouldn’t be the poaching and the horrible things we know about.”
He ordered Bell, who is from Dundee, to pay a £1400 fine plus tax and a victim surcharge of £75.
Bell, dressed in a white blouse, showed no reaction as the sentence was handed down.
At the previous hearing in May, prosecutor Karon Rollo explained that Bell first came to the attention of the authorities in March 2022 when Border Force staff at Heathrow Airport became suspicious that packages she was sending to China contained elephant ivory.
She was arrested in December 2022 following an investigation by the National Wildlife Crime Unit, which found she had used multiple eBay accounts to sell the items.
Rollo told the court that when advertising the items, Bell photographed them with a set of scales, which would have told collectors that the items were ivory rather than bovine bone, as ivory is much heavier.
She also said that following her arrest Bell admitted receiving letters from customs advising her she needed export licences for the packages she was sending overseas, but that she had ignored them.
The prices she was recording on the packages she was sending were also found to be far lower than what the goods had actually sold for.
Bell was fined £1400 after pleading guilty to offences under the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 and Ivory Act 2018.
Iain Batho, who leads for the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service’s wildlife and economic crime unit, said: “In this case, whilst the actions of Joyce Bell may seem remote from the suffering of elephants in the wild, the two are directly linked.
“Without an illegal ivory market driving demand for such items, there would be no need for the ongoing harm being caused to wild elephants.
“COPFS takes offences committed under the Ivory Act seriously and action will be taken against those who choose to engage in such conduct, where there is sufficient evidence of a crime and where it is in the overall public interest to do so.
“The result in this case is a testament to the collaborative working between COPFS, Police Scotland, the UK National Wildlife Crime Unit and the UK Border Force Agency.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here