LABOUR have refused to rule out sending refugees back to the Taliban-controlled Afghanistan from which they escaped.
Stephen Flynn, the SNP’s Westminster leader, accused Keir Starmer’s party of engaging with a “populist dog whistle” after they also declined to say they would not send asylum seekers back to Iran.
Appearing on BBC Newsnight on Monday, Labour’s shadow paymaster general Jonathan Ashworth insisted that the Tories’ Rwanda scheme would not work as a deterrent to prevent people trying to come to the UK.
Instead, he said Labour are “going to send people back” to the countries from which they are fleeing.
He said: “We're going to process people's claims, and we're going to get on with processing people's claims and those people who shouldn't be here when they come from countries like Bangladesh or wherever, we're going to send them back.”
Asked why that would deter people from trying to cross the Channel on small boats, Ashworth said: “Because at the moment they get, they come over here, they know Rwanda only deals with 1%. The rest could stay in a hotel for the rest of their lives.
“That's a big thrashing incentive to come here. Whereas we're saying that rather than sending flights to Rwanda, we're going to be sending flights to all the countries that these people came from by sending people back.”
Ignoring facts in favour of a populist dog whistle.
— Stephen Flynn (@StephenFlynnSNP) June 25, 2024
The race to the right in Westminster politics is there for all to see.
The Tories chase Reform. Labour chase the Tories.
And this is the result. Depressing.pic.twitter.com/nSDvsg9E7E
BBC host Victoria Derbyshire pointed to official figures which show that most asylum seekers in the UK come from Afghanistan and Iran.
She asked if Labour would look to get a return agreement with the Taliban and with the Iranian regime.
Pushed after repeatedly dodging the question, Ashworth said: “Well, you look at each one on its merits, obviously.”
He added: “We’re going to get returns agreements … well, that’s a different. The Taliban in Afghanistan is a different set up."
Asked again if Labour would get a returns agreement with the Taliban, Ashworth said: “I'm giving you practical examples of where we believe we can deal with these problems.
READ MORE: Expect shredded nerves as Labour and SNP are neck-and-neck in this constituency
“At the moment, people coming here from the Indian subcontinent, you know, do not get returned, they get put up in hotels and they can stay in these hotels for the rest of their lives. That's the Tory policy.
“So when we say we're going to get flights off, yeah, we're going to have to get flights taking people back to countries like this, where we get returns agreements.
“We're not going to put our hands in the air and say, ‘Oh, well, sorry, we can't do it’. We've got to deal with this issue.”
Responding to the interview, the SNP’s Flynn said that Labour were moving further and further towards a Reform-inspired position on immigration.
He wrote: “Ignoring facts in favour of a populist dog whistle. The race to the right in Westminster politics is there for all to see.
“The Tories chase Reform. Labour chase the Tories. And this is the result. Depressing.”
The National contributor Owen Jones said: "I would rather pull my own nails out than vote for this."
READ MORE: Brexit exposed a 'Westminster knows best' union, says John Swinney
Nato left Afghanistan in 2021, quickly leading to the Taliban taking back power in the country.
The Taliban brought back bans on education for girls and laws stopping women from going to work.
The Taliban also banned women’s beauty salons, adding on laws that prevent women from being in public spaces like parks and gyms.
The National's foreign editor David Pratt wrote in 2023: "Such is the sustained severity of the Taliban’s onslaught that some leading human rights observers have called it 'intentional cruelty', 'gender apartheid' and a 'war on women'."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel