SCOTLAND’S Finance Secretary has condemned the “appalling waste of public money” after reports that the UK Government had destroyed an estimated £1.4 billion worth of personal protective equipment (PPE).
The items, which were all acquired by the Tory government in a single deal during the pandemic, have been destroyed or written off, it is understood.
Figures published by the BBC showed there were at least 1.57 billion items of PPE provided by Northamptonshire supplier Full Support Healthcare that will never be used.
The company struck a £1.78bn deal with the government to supply face masks, aprons, eye protection and respirators in April 2020.
According to the BBC report, this was the largest Covid-19 PPE order, accounting for 13% of the government’s total spend.
READ MORE: Tory government's 'waste' of public cash on PPE laid bare with Scottish comparison
Finance Secretary Shona Robison said: “Wow a new level of appalling waste of public money by the Tories!”
Shadow health secretary Wes Streeting said: “We know that billions of pounds were wasted during the pandemic on corruption and incompetence by the Conservatives, but this is the worst example I have ever seen.
“£1.4bn on one contract, paying for PPE that was never used, and Rishi Sunak’s fingerprints are all over it.
“That is money that could have been used to pay the salaries of 37,000 NHS nurses.
“It is staggering waste, and we need a full and frank account as to how so much public money was thrown down the toilet.”
Over the course of six months, BBC Investigations made a series of Freedom of Information (FOI) Act requests to NHS Supply Chain.
The responses showed that of the 2.02 billion items of PPE provided by Full Support Healthcare, only 232 million items have been dispatched to the NHS or other care settings.
It is understood about 749 million items have already been burned or destroyed, while a further 825 million are classified as excess stock.
According to the report, the government had previously estimated about £85 million worth of PPE secured under the contract would not be used.
The BBC understands that at least £100m of additional public money has been spent on storing and incinerating the excess stock since its purchase.
READ MORE: Michelle Mone hits out after being named in Rishi Sunak BBC interview
A Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) spokesperson said: “We do not recognise the £1.4bn quoted.
“Our position on PPE stock is set out in the department’s annual accounts as audited by the National Audit Office.
“PPE was secured at the height of the pandemic, competing in an overheated global market where demand massively outstripped supply.
“Nearly half of all the remaining stock was sold, recycled, or donated by the department. In line with our reduction of storage and disposal strategy unused items will be turned into energy from waste which will see the department recoup further costs.”
In January, DHSC accounts revealed some £9.9bn of the £13.6bn spent on PPE had been written off as some items were defective or not suitable, while others will not be used before their expiry date.
An accountability report by the National Audit Office (NAO) said that the department plans to dispose of “nearly all” of its current PPE stock held in warehouses and containers.
At the time, Downing Street defended the losses by stressing the circumstances the Covid-19 pandemic caused, such as PPE being in short supply leading to a hike in costs.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel