KEIR Starmer is putting a “whiff of power” before his obligations on Palestine, the SNP have said, amid reports the Labour leader is planning to delay the recognition of Palestinian statehood.
He had pledged to recognise Palestinian statehood and said this would be part of any Middle East peace accord with Israel.
Starmer said it was “very important we have a viable Palestinian state alongside a safe and secure Israel”.
However, The Times reports that a source close to Starmer said that British recognition of Palestine was a “process” and would have the most impact if done in “co-ordination with allies”.
Members of his inner circle are reportedly concerned such a move could isolate him from allies such as the US, although the source denied this would have any influence.
The SNP’s foreign affairs spokesperson Brendan O’Hara has now accused Starmer and Rishi Sunak of having “dithered and delayed” for too long on the issue, warning that innocent Palestinians have no time left for Western leaders to “find their moral compass”.
READ MORE: Question Time: Stephen Flynn clashes with Fiona Bruce on gambling
The death toll in Gaza has now reportedly passed 37,700 since the beginning of Israel’s bombardment.
O’Hara commented: “Yet again we’re seeing Sir Keir Starmer put a whiff of power before his moral obligations.
“When SNP MPs first sought a ceasefire vote in the House of Commons, the Labour Party cynically played political games with the motion, all while innocent men, women and children were dying from Israeli bombs and starvation.
“And now, as the assault on Gaza intensifies and the death toll rises, we see more of the dither and delay that has defined Starmer and Sunak’s response to the collective punishment of the Palestinian people.”
Earlier this week, former first minister Humza Yousaf also urged Keir Starmer (above) to act quickly on the issue in his first speech at Holyrood since resigning.
O’Hara added: “Innocent Gazans have no time left to wait for Western leaders to find their moral compass and finally do the right thing.
“They need to see sustained action to secure an immediate ceasefire, an end of arms sales to Israel and the recognition of the Palestinian state.
“Sir Keir Starmer may be putting his political aspirations before the Palestinian people, but the SNP never will.
READ MORE: Clacton: Labour 'block own candidate' from campaigning against Reform
“We have consistently stood with the innocent people of Palestine, and SNP MPs will continue to hold the Labour Party to account.
“The Labour Party must, without any equivocation or delay, finally recognise the state of Palestine as a key first step in the path towards a peaceful, two-state solution in the Middle East.
“Westminster should finally show some international leadership that has been so sorely lacking from both the Tories and Labour.”
Last month, the Labour leader downplayed suggestions the recognition of the Palestinian state by the UK would happen anytime soon.
He said: “It has got to be at the right time in the process because we need a viable Palestinian state alongside a safe and secure Israel.
“We don’t have either of those at the moment, and therefore it has got to be at the point of the process where we could see both of those outcomes.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel