THE Jouker can think of any number of ways people might describe Scottish Labour’s Anas Sarwar.
But while we might know him as the branch office manager, a major news outlet has now taken something of a different approach.
In a new piece from Politico, Sarwar has been described as the “next king of Scotland” and the “undoubted rising star of Holyrood politics”.
READ MORE: Douglas Ross says SNP every ten seconds in 'embarrassing' broadcast
It comes in quite the week for Sarwar, in which he has so far failed to sack a candidate who claimed his party were up for backing the Tories. That’s right, the Tories led by Boris Johnson at the 2019 General Election.
The piece predicts that Sarwar will “end the SNP’s stranglehold in Scotland” come July 4 but adds that he is “steeped in grand political tradition” given that his father Mohammed Sarwar served as the governor of Punjab.
The Scottish Labour leader was drawing praise for everything from his political know-how to his dress sense.
“He’s a slick dresser, eschewing dull gray for fitted dark suits,” the piece says.
“He launched his party’s manifesto from a Scottish rugby stadium last week in a crisp white shirt, sleeves rolled up – very Blair, and also very Starmer.
“He often drops the tie, too.”
The praise didn’t end there as readers are told that “Sarwar [below] has a ready charm and is close to the Holyrood press pack in a way that more aloof politicians, such as [Nicola] Sturgeon, never were”.
And how could we not want a man to be our next “king” given that he apparently calls everyone, from journalists to shadow cabinet ministers, “chief”.
Sarwar was even so bold to suggest that he was able to change his boss Keir Starmer’s mind on a few things, including the headquartering of the famous GB Energy in Scotland rather than elsewhere in the UK.
There were some negatives though, with one Labour official telling Politico that Sarwar’s influence on Starmer, the man likely to be the next prime minister, would be similar to a “mid-level shadow Cabinet member”.
It’s hardly a description befitting of a “king” is it?
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel