GLASGOW councillors have agreed to bring in a new tourist tax for the city as soon as possible with hopes it could raise millions.
It would see visitors pay an extra charge on top of overnight accommodation costs.
There are hopes it could be brought into force as soon as the financial year 2026 to 2027 – in year three of the council’s current budget.
Scottish Greens councillor Blair Anderson gained approval to kick start the process to make the visitor levy a reality and said: “There is no time to waste.”
He hopes tourist tax money could start trickling into the local authority by year three of the budget period, which began in April.
READ MORE: What is a 'tourist tax' and how would this proposed idea work in Scotland?
Councillor Anderson would like to see the cash spent on parks, street cleaning and cultural venues among other services to benefit residents as well as visitors.
He said: “There is more than enough money out there in this country to fund public services properly to tackle the climate crisis, to lift children out of poverty. We just need to tax it fairly.”
Seconding the motion, Scottish Greens councillor Holly Bruce said: “Councils are strapped for cash, have limited revenue raising powers are disenfranchised from doing the right thing by our constituents because of fiscal limitations placed on us and the centralisation of power.”
City treasurer councillor Ricky Bell moved an amendment that the tourist industry must be involved in the introduction of the tax.
While supporting the motion, SNP councillor Bell said: “I have to inject a little bit of realism.”
He said: “We have to be careful in setting expectations about how much money the levy could raise.”
Although calling for the levy to be introduced as soon as possible he pointed out that Scottish Government legislation is “restrictive” in what the tourist tax can be spent on and it can’t be used to solve “budget problems".
Councillor Anderson added that £10 million to £20m could be generated from the tourist tax but the time frame for that amount being generated was not mentioned in the meeting.
He admitted that the levy couldn’t close a £110m deficit that was faced by the council in response to councillor Bell’s comments.
The accepted motion with the SNP amendment said there is to be speedy preparation of “an outline of the proposed scheme" among other actions including an assessment of the impacts of the proposal in Glasgow.
It also added that the “council believes that early and ongoing engagement with Glasgow’s tourism and visitor industry (including the Glasgow Tourism Advisory Forum), trade unions, tenants unions, community organisations and Glasgow residents throughout the process of developing a Visitor Levy Scheme will be vital, while also noting the urgency of council’s budget pressures and reiterating the need for speedy introduction of a visitor levy scheme".
The Visitor Levy (Scotland) Bill was passed in the Scottish Parliament on May 28 granting councils the the power to impose the visitor charge.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel