STRIDING home from the pub on Saturday night, a contact sent me a video by WhatsApp.
“Would the National enjoy the Aberdeen South Labour candidate saying he wanted the Tories to win in 2019?” they asked.
“Belter,” I replied. “Can I hang on to this?”
We held onto the story for a few days to allow me to go to the Conservative manifesto launch and get out to Cumbernauld for a constituency profile.
By Wednesday, I had enough time to look at this extraordinary story properly.
Tauqeer Malik was caught on camera telling a voter that Labour – his party – threw the 2019 election, hoping that the Tories would keep the seat. It is a staggering admission from a party whose main pitch is to get the Tories out.
Labour’s defence? He was simply lying.
READ MORE: Sack Labour candidate after 'we helped Tories in 2019' comment, Keir Starmer urged
The story went from a simple tip to our front page fairly rapidly. Since the original piece, we have published 11 more stories on it.
I quickly followed it up with the 2019 Labour candidate in Aberdeen South Shona Simpson responding to Malik’s claim, saying it was “ridiculous”.
Then my colleague Steph Brawn highlighted how shadow Scottish secretary Ian Murray had been spotted out on the campaign trail with Malik.
Analysis by Xander Elliards of what the revelations really tell us about Labour’s priorities in Scotland came the same day.
Then followed a barrage of reaction and some more analysis on Scotland’s “Better Together” councils, where Labour and the Tories are working together to keep the SNP out.
Keir Starmer then Anas Sarwar (above) were urged to sack Malik for his comments.
Yesterday, I ventured out from our Glasgow office to Kirkcaldy, Fife, to do a profile on one of Scotland’s key battleground seats.
As luck would have it, Sarwar was there. The press call was not well attended, meaning that in effect The National was given a rare (for us, for obvious reasons) exclusive interview with the Scottish Labour leader.
READ MORE: Anas Sarwar urged to show 'integrity' over Tory-backing Labour candidate
Are you going to sack him, I asked. Sarwar said what Malik had told this voter was “stupid” and “not true”.
I was quite surprised to hear him use those words. “Not true”. Not that they were “wrong” or “mistaken” but not true.
Labour’s defence was that their candidate, the man they ostensibly want to represent part of one of Scotland’s great cities, is a man happy to lie to members of the public on their doorsteps.
Is he a paper candidate, I followed up. Sarwar implied they really did want him to win. Labour won 3000 votes in Aberdeen South last time around. It looks unlikely they expect to do much better this time around.
Our second front page on the story was sorted.
Our scoop got followed up in Aberdeen Live, The Herald, and the Press and Journal, further putting the heat on Labour.
It’s amazing how one message can lead to a story that just runs and runs and runs. The moral of the story for readers of The National: if you think you’ve got a story for us – let us know!
Newsletter subscribers get Behind the Headlines delivered straight to their email inboxes every Friday at 7pm for FREE by clicking here.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel