SUPPORT for independence is not yet high enough to break away from the United Kingdom – but a Labour government at Westminster will “help in that regard”, Stephen Flynn has said.
In an exclusive interview with Lesley Riddoch for The National, the SNP Westminster leader was pushed on the direction he would like to see his party take in order to gain Scottish independence.
The SNP have said that if they win a majority of Scottish seats at the General Election – at least 29 out of the 57 on offer – they will take that as a mandate to open independence negotiations with the UK Government.
First Minister John Swinney has said those negotiations should actually be about a repeat of the 2014 referendum – which was held using a Section 30 order from the UK government to allow Holyrood to legislate in a reserved area.
However, both Labour leader Keir Starmer and Tory leader Rishi Sunak have said that they will flatly refuse any request for a second independence referendum regardless of how the people of Scotland vote.
Speaking to Flynn, Riddoch raised a question from one National reader who asked: “What are the next steps? If there's no Section 30 coming, what's the plan?”
He said: “I would be pretty confident in my mind that if we do win a majority and the United Kingdom prime minister – a Labour United Kingdom prime minister – says no and ignores the view of the people of Scotland, that's quite a compelling argument to take into the 2026 election.”
READ MORE: I'm a leading doctor in Scotland – I trust the SNP on the NHS, not Labour
Riddoch said that, before Swinney took control of the party in May, the SNP had seemed to be heading towards treating the 2026 Holyrood election as a de facto referendum.
The National columnist put it to Flynn that “things have changed because John Swinney is not up for it”.
Responding, Flynn said that was “definitely” not the case, and insisted that the SNP’s direction would be decided by the party membership.
He further argued that polling numbers – which suggest that 50% of Scotland support independence while 50% oppose it – are “not good enough”, but that a Labour government implementing conservative policies at Westminster would help move the dial.
Flynn said: “The point I was trying to make was, whilst parliamentary machinations are all undertaken over the course of the next 10 days and beyond, we need to make sure that we are actually winning the argument here.
“We're still 50/50 in the polls and that's not good enough. We need to be doing better.
“We need to convince people that independence is the right way forward and we need to do that in big numbers.
“I actually think a Labour government's going to help in that regard, because the change that people might be expecting isn't going to come.
READ MORE: 'Not surprised': John Swinney tears into Labour over Tory-backing MP hopeful
“We know what [shadow chancellor] Rachel Reeves stands for. We know that she believes in the continuation of austerity, massive public sector cuts, has the same fiscal rules as the Tories. [Former Bank of England chief economist Andy Haldane] said there was a ‘lettuce leaf’ between the Labour and Tory fiscal rules.
“We know that on Brexit we're not going to see any on the single market or customs union or freedom of movement.
“We know that on the cost of living, there's not going to be anything substantial put on the table in terms of energy bills, mortgage payments, or food bills.
“So as we build up to that 2026 election, with the party position being what it is, with a Labour government not delivering, I think that's quite a compelling narrative for us to grow support for independence.”
Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar has also previously suggested that his party’s fate at the 2026 Holyrood elections could be tied to how a Starmer-led government performs in London.
In February, he told The New Statesman: “I am really open with Keir and the UK shadow cabinet that I want to and need to be going into a 2026 election in the midterm of a popular Labour government, not an unpopular one.”
Elsewhere in the exclusive interview, Riddoch challenged Flynn on his position on oil and gas licensing and the environmental test the SNP say new fields will have to pass, Labour’s plans for GB Energy, and perceptions of his party after 17 years in power at Holyrood.
You can watch the full interview here.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel